1、ssE T L NS*田 贺, 张志东* , 李亚东, 吴 林, 刘海广吉林农业大学园艺学院, 长春130118K 1: 为科学地简化茶 属植物果实品质的评价指标,采用主成分分析方法, 以茶 属植物不同种间的果实为材料,对测得的果实维生素Ca可溶性固形物a可溶性糖a有机酸a色价a出汁率等12项指标进行了分析b依据性状累积方差贡献率达到85%以上, 提出了3个反映茶 属植物果实主要品质的主成分及其主成分函数式b通过计算各种重要主成分值,进而选择综合性状优良的种b其结果与种的实际表型相近似, 表明主成分分析法对茶 属植物果实品质主要性状综合评选比优良性状打分评优更科学a简便b1oM: 茶 属植物;
2、 果实品质; 主成分分析; 评价指标ms |: S66319; Q949175112 DS M : A cI|: 1000- 5684( 2009) 05- 0632- 05Application of Principal Component Analysis in Quality Evaluation In-dices of Fruit Quality for RibesTIAN He, ZHANG Zh-i dong, LI Ya-dong, WU Lin, LIU Ha-i guangCollege of Horticulture, Jilin Agricultural Universi
3、ty, Changchun 130118, ChinaAbstract: In order to simplify the indices for evaluating fruit quality without decreasing the informationvolume contained in Ribes L. , multivariate statistics methods of principal component analysis were usedfor analyzing 12 fruit quality indices, including fruit vitamin
4、 C content, total soluble solid content, juicypercentage, sugar, organic acid, color scale, juice rate etc. for fresh fruit of various species of Ribes L.duce one kilogram kernel. According to more than 85% of the cumulative variance proportion, the resultsproposed three principal components and the
5、ir function equations which reflected the main qualities ofRibes L. The key principal component values of various varieties were calculated. The method could beapplied to select fine species and the results were similar to practical phenotype. The method of principalcomponent analysis was more scien
6、tific and simple than the method of giving a mark of main fruit qualityof Ribes L. It will provide a theoretical basis for selecting fine breeding materials for Ribes L.Key words: Ribes L; fruit quality; principal component analysis; quality evaluation indicesss ViBM11“M+8M ,78M ?Q M 41,V7e ,sM WL1“
7、 1bs8M , OM , sT4S, V 8VC, S B L=ilb ( Ribes L. ) 9 S( Saxifra-gaceae)B l9 !, Tb W150 ,1s oe u,Ss50,7 3 , T LV ma C,T L aaa*YT “:m S “(nyhyzx07-028, 2006-G25) , 8 S/?Z9 “( 20075013)Te:B , 3, V 3,Z_:T bl : 2008-12-20 : 2009-02-28吉林农业大学学报 2009, 31( 5) : 632 636 http:/ /xuebao.jlau. edu. cnJournal of J
8、ilin Agricultural University E-mail:jlndxb vip. sina. comsa 2- 4bT3T ,y T L7a !N, OF ?z# a7 s e 5b “ -TT Z a ZZ , ,7 O T L N C“dSZEbYV 1T L s,)ssZE 4 V, 44 G b1 ZE111 : Z ( Blackcurrant) ) ( Ben Lomond)a Z ( Redcurrant) ) ( Cherry)aZ ( Gooseberries) ) )( Zuiyu)TL1 jvlTb7 3:0( R. komarovii A. Pojark)
9、as=0( R. komarovii A. Pojark var. cuneifolium Liou)a0( R. mandshuricum Kon. )T L1; L( R.rubrum L. )T L1 a 8T !b112 ZE“T L“ ,sYTa:# qa V %a V 6a 6a V 6a a 6- 7a 3 C 7a N 8ac 9,iSSRE! sA_(V1)b113 d9ZEd9 qSAS 10- 11 ,V“M1?,V1121Sss, Z D qr85% s bM1 +_ , sf Vr T,K 9 1s, 4bV1 T L!sTable1. Theresult of nu
10、tritionquality of Ribes fruitCharacter Z Blackcurrant Z RedcurrantZ Gooseberry LR. rubrumR. mandshuricumR. komaroviis=R. komaroviim(T) / g(X1)W. O. F. 1102A 0123D 1108A 0138C 0168B 0128CD 0123Dd(:) / cm ( X2)L.D. 11224AB 01752D 11322A 01940C 11112B 01850CD 01746Dd() / cm ( X3)T.D. 11278A 01790CD 113
11、04A 01882C 11068B 01800D 01628Dw( V %)/ % ( X4)Soluble solid1119AB 719D 1218A 1018BC 911CD 1016ABC 1316Aw( V )/ % ( X5)Soluble sugar8108B 5185D 7169C 7160C 5137E 9160A 9150Aw( )/ % ( X6)Organic acid2195A 1188C 1174D 0167F 2181B 0194E 0167Fw() /(mg#g- 1) ( X7)Protein311C 0177E 0173E 5175B 1117D 8164A
12、 8138AN( X8)Color scale 14127A 1145C 0190D 0127E 2102B 0185D 0191Dw( a) / % ( X9)Tannic Acid 0133D 0135D 0122D 2100B 0177C 2189A 2174Aw( 3 C) /( mg#100g- 1) ( X10)Vitamin C130124B 24164G 31168F 70140D 147184A 63136E 95104Cw() / % ( X11)Flavonoid 0106D 0105D 0112D 4162B 2116C 4182B 4165A q/ % ( X12)J
13、uice rate 6815A 5316B 4317C 3116F 3716D 2519G 3218E633田 贺等: 主成分分析法在茶 属植物果实品质评价指标上的应用研究吉林农业大学学报Journal of Jilin Agricultural University2 Ts2. 1 sss+ D q 4sG,| 12S12sbV2 V A,1s+61753 5,Z D q561297 2% ,V 561297 2%, K1s;2s+21345 4,Z D q191556 9% ,V 191556 9%,3s+11440,Z D q111999 6% , s D qsY91417 6%a212
14、02 5%a01556 2% ,GQ Ah b-3s Z D q871823 7%,- T L1871823 7%Q ,yN V | -3sT T L48SbV2 T LsZ D q Z D qTable 2. Economic characters in Ribes varianceproportionand cumulative variance proportion of four princ-ipal componentssPRIN+Eigenvalue D q/ %Proportion D q/ %Cumulative12345661753 521345 411440 011130
15、101264 301066 7561279 2191556 9111999 691417 621202 501556 2561297 2751824 1871823 7971241 3991443 81001000 0V3 1T LM1 +_ Table3. Eigenvectors of correlationmatrix of main economic characters in RibesChara-cterX1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X10 X11 X121sPRIN1 Y12sPRIN2 Y23sPRIN3 Y301324 801290 8- 01132
16、001305 801263 7- 01127 101305 501205 2- 01131 7- 01054 901581 9- 01192 4- 01202 401447 1- 01257 201350 0- 01071 401296 9- 01326 701297 801176 401243 201299 501316 1- 01360 201167 801166 401094 301193 901739 9- 01344 401121 501225 401310 301036 301027 1s M ?LF,svl8C s1b M1 +_ (V3) , V -3sf Vr T:Y1= 0
17、1342 8X1 + 01305 8X2 + 01305 5X3 -01054 9X4- 01202 4X5+ 01350 0X6- 01326 7X7+01243 2X8 - 01360 2X9 + 01094 3X10 -01344 4X11+ 013103 3X12;Y2= 01290 8X1 + 01263 7X2 + 01205 2X3 +01581 9X4+ 01447 1X5- 01071 4X6+ 01297 8X7+01299 5X8 + 01167 8X9 + 01193 9X10 +01121 5X11+ 01036 3X12;Y3= - 01132 0X1 - 0112
18、7 1X2- 01131 7X3-01192 4X4- 01257 2X5+ 01296 9X6+ 01176 4X7+01316 1X8 + 01166 4X9 + 01739 9X10 +01225 4X11+ 01027 1X12bV3f 1“ T V,1sY1, X6aTX1a qX12a:X2aX3 v“ , X6Kv,X1aX12Q; X9aX11X7 v“ , c a qT v H, aac ,V 1s1Q T L a qT +b2sY2, V %X4a V X5 NX83“ v, X4Kv,2s) n1,7X6 v“ b2s v H V %a V c NA ,7 c ,yN2s
19、 Vj V %c T L = b3sY3, 3 CX10a NX8 X63“ v, 3 Cc 1Tb3sc 6 H,3 Ca c N9M9FbyN,3s V jF Sb634 吉林农业大学学报 2009年10月Journal of Jilin Agricultural University2009, OctobersZ D qsM1+_ BV : a qa V%a V a 3 C N Y T L 1y , TL;!NzF+b212 4 Nvl | % Nvl,s 3 =dV , 3s- z8 T L a qaV %a V a 3 C N1 +, Vr871823 7%byN,3s V48 b
20、1snV4bV4 sTable4. Principal component value (PCV) of RibesSpecies Z Blackcurrant Z RedcurrantZ Gooseberry LR. rubrumR. mandshuricumR. komaroviis=R. komarovii1sPRIN12sPRIN23sPRIN331720 711943 201982 601514 0- 21928 5 - 01662 7 21280 801829 5- 21345 9 - 11932 7- 01043 9- 01151 211856 6- 11367 6 11733
21、5- 31063 9 01411 601071 0- 31375 6 11155 801372 7V4 Vn, k ,1s GQ Z ( 31720 7 )aZ ( 21280 8 )a( 11856 6 )a Z ( 01514 0) ;2s GQ Z( 11943 2)as=( 11155 8 )aZ ( 01829 5)a( 01411 6) ;3s GQ ( 11733 5)a Z ( 01982 6)as=( 01372 7)b1sUSa23s:US,Tm ,Tnm1bm1Vn, Z 1a23s , !N aF za a7 J;Z 1a2s,3s, !N aF Ba a7J;1a3s
22、,2s, !N aF , a7 J;s=2a3s ,Bs ,F z; L1a2a3sB, a7 JF, T L 7a , aRT4 ! 7?a ba. Z Blackcurrant; b. Z Redcurrant; c.Z Gooseberry; d. LR.rubrum; e.R. mandshuricum; f.R. komarovii; g.s=R. komaroviim1 3s mFig.1. Coordinate diagrams of distinct principal component value in Ribes635田 贺等: 主成分分析法在茶 属植物果实品质评价指标上
23、的应用研究吉林农业大学学报Journal of Jilin Agricultural University3 (1)YVss,| T L121 3sb3s4 85% , O 8aM Sb|ssZE 4,; ?8VC, ?e4, us y, Sb(2) T L“, T L3sf T, sf T 9 s V TL8S4 G b(3)ssE, T L8 S , TL=VMbV ssZE 4# 3 ( vNb ID: 1 .d9s# M .: jv, 1991.2 I ,.lT 3M .:S j, 2002.3 k,bY, o.S0 7 3T J .Z,1995( 2): 15-17.4 . lT J
24、 .T , 1986, 15( 1): 15-17.5 ,u;,f,. u0 # 7? J . jv, 2002,24( 5) : 75-77.6 f,f , Z. 3 LM .:S j S/ ,2004.7 ,.T !EM .: j,1982: 134-138.8 . 7 3T c J .S7 3,1989( 1) : 40-43.9 , b. TT L9c J . CD0, 2001( 4) :252.10 =, . SAS# J .:S j,1998: 158-163.11 E . j kd9M .: jv, 1993: 188-203.( 631:) 4 Kakov L A,Zaits
25、eva A F.Introduction of Hippophae rhamnoides L.in the far northJ . Pacthrtejibhbie pecypchi, 1998, 34( 3) : 45-51. 5 , VE.GCGC/ MS sP 1 J . S/, 2006, ( 7) : 27-35. 6 f=, a F # sZE D .+: = v, 2007. 7 2 M,u+, . A s# J . ,1995, 8( 1) : 27-28. . 8 , , ssJ .S7 3, 1987, ( 3) : 1. 9 Cyberlipid C. Resource
26、site for lipid studies EB/ OL . 2008-12-08. http: / / www. cyberlipid. org/ cyberlip.10 ,. “=Y | .ssJ .S0, 1996, 3( 1): 19-20.11 2 M, . FsGC/HPLC J .S, 1995, 20( 1) : 40-43.12 +I, Z,.S 0ss J.S7 3, 1994(3) : 46-47.13 ,= l, ,.vT T? 4|ZE s1 J ., 2008, 70-72.14 Zo, U. T . s1 J. J S, 2008, 29: 378-381.636 吉林农业大学学报 2009年10月Journal of Jilin Agricultural University2009, October
