1、 98 , 49 , , 14.29% 16.33% 16.33% 2.04%, , 7 14 21 (P3 /d; 2 m L/kg ; 24 h 1.5 cm 3 7 14 21 1.4 SPSS 19.0 , , t ; (n) , (%) P0.05 2 2.1 7 , 8 , 8 , 1 ; 13 , 19 , 20 , 4 , (P0.05) , 1 1 (n) Table 1 Comparison of feeding intolerance between the two groups (n) 2.2 3 ; 7 14 21 , (P0.05) , 2 2.3 , (P0.05
2、) , 3 3 1 500 g , 11 12, , , , , , , 13-14 , , , , , 15 , , , 16 , , , , , , (P0.05) ; 25 83.67%, (44.90%) , (P0.05) ; , , 2 3 (n) Table 3 Comparison of the number of days of transition to total gastrointestinal nutrition between two groups of children (n) , , 1 . J. , 2014, 29 (13) :40-41. 2Nzegwu
3、NI, Ehrenkranz RA.Post-discharge Nutrition and the VLBW Infant:To Supplement or Not Supplement:A Review of the Current EvidenceJ.Clin Perinatol, 2014, 41 (2) :463-474. 3 , , , . J. , 2013, 28 (6) :379-383. 4 , , , . J. , 2015, 29 (2) :647-649. 5Watson J, Mc Guire W.Nasal versus oral route for placin
4、g feeding tubes in preterm or low birth weight infantsJ.Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013, 28:2. 6Senterre T.Practice of enteral nutrition in very low birth weight and extremely low birth weight infantsJ.World Rev Nutr Diet, 2014, 110:201-214. 7Dawson JA, Summan R, Badawi N, et al.Push versus gravity
5、 for intermittent bolus gavage tube feeding of premature and low birthweight infantsJ.Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2012, 11:CD005249. 8 , , , . J. , 2010, 2 (5) :268-271. 9 , , , . J. , 2009, 47 (3) :209-215. 10 , , , . J. , 2012, 27 (2) :109-111. 11 , , , . J. , 2014, 23 (7) :86-88. 12 . J. , 2014, 31 (8) :135-136. 13 , , , . J. , 2016, 31 (2) :101-104. 14 , , , . J. , 2013, 30 (22) :63-65. 15Ramani M, Ambalavanan N.Feeding practices and necrotizingenterocolitisJ.Clin Perinatol, 2013, 40 (1) :1-10. 16 , , , . J. , 2013, 10 (16) :4-5.
