收藏 分享(赏)

and Lumbar Spine Fractures and Dislocations 胸腰椎骨折脱位课件.ppt

上传人:微传9988 文档编号:2446120 上传时间:2018-09-17 格式:PPT 页数:74 大小:4.27MB
下载 相关 举报
and Lumbar Spine Fractures and Dislocations 胸腰椎骨折脱位课件.ppt_第1页
第1页 / 共74页
and Lumbar Spine Fractures and Dislocations 胸腰椎骨折脱位课件.ppt_第2页
第2页 / 共74页
and Lumbar Spine Fractures and Dislocations 胸腰椎骨折脱位课件.ppt_第3页
第3页 / 共74页
and Lumbar Spine Fractures and Dislocations 胸腰椎骨折脱位课件.ppt_第4页
第4页 / 共74页
and Lumbar Spine Fractures and Dislocations 胸腰椎骨折脱位课件.ppt_第5页
第5页 / 共74页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

1、Thoracic and Lumbar Spine Fractures and Dislocations: Assessment and Classification,Jim A. Youssef, M.D.Original Authors: Christopher Bono, MD and Mitch Harris, MD; March 2004 Jim A. Youssef, MD; Revised January 2006 and May 2011,Anatomy of Thoracic Spine,Kyphosis is natural alignment Narrow spinal

2、canal Facet orientation Rib factor on stability Conus at T12-L1,Anatomy of Lumbar Spine,Lordosis is natural alignment Larger vertebral bodies Facet orientation Cauda equina,Thoracolumbar Junction,Transition ZoneKyphosis LordosisMechanical Difference: Lumbar spine less stiff in flexion,Transition Zon

3、e: Predisposed to Failure,Little opportunity for force dispersionCentral loadingof T-L junctionNot anatomically disposed to transfer force,Patient Evaluation,Pre-hospital careEMT personnel Initial assessment Transport and immobilization,Patient Evaluation,ABCs of Trauma History Physical Examination

4、Neurological Classification,Clinical Assessment,Inspection Palpation Neurological Evaluation ASIA Impairment Scale Sensory Evaluation Motor Evaluation Reflex Evaluation Bulbocavernosus, Babinski,Clinical Assessment,Associated Injuries Meyer, 1984 28% have other major organ system injuries Noncontigu

5、ous spine fractures 3-56% Always monitor Hematocrit GU: Foley recommended, check post-void residuals, if abnormal get cystometrogram GI: prepare for ileus.,Radiographic Evaluation,Trauma series includes: lateral cervical, chest, lateral thoracic, A/P and lateral lumbar and A/P pelvisObtunded patient

6、s require further skeletal survey Mackersie et al J Trauma 1988,Additional Imaging,CT scan bony injuriesMRI images spinal cord, intervertebral discs, ligamentous structures,CT Scan,L3 unstable burst fracture,MRI Scan,Thoracic fracture subluxation with increased signal in conus medullaris,Thoracolumb

7、ar Fractures Controversies,CLASSIFICATION! Indications for surgery Optimal time for surgery Best approach for surgery,Classifications Necessary for,Uniform method of description Directing treatment * Facilitating outcome analysis Should be:ComprehensiveReproducibleUsableAccurate,Bhler 1930,Importanc

8、e of injury mechanism Determines proper reduction maneuver Evaluated fractures using: Plain roentgenograms, anatomic dissection of fatalities 6 types of spinal fractures included in system Compression Flexion Extension Lateral flexion Shear Torsional,Bhler, Fractures and Dislocation of the Spine, 19

9、56,Bhler, Verlag von Wilhem Maudrich 1930,Morphologic Classification Watson-Jones 38,Descriptive terms based on 252 films 7 types Examples: Wedge fracture (compression fx) Comminuted fracture (burst fx) Fracture dislocation,Morphologic Classification,1930,40,50,60,70,80,90,2000,10,CT evolved,MRI evo

10、lved,*,Morphologic Classification Stable vs. Unstable Nicoll 49,Based on review of 152 coal miners Recognized importance of posterior ligaments 4 fracture types: Stable = post ligaments intact Unstable = post elements disrupted,Morphologic Classification,1930,40,50,60,70,80,90,2000,10,CT evolved,MRI

11、 evolved,*,Post elements important,Holdsworth62 Kelley & Whitesides 68,Denis 83 McAfee 83 Ferguson & Allen84,Anatomic Classification 2 or 3 Columns,Anatomic Classification 2 Column Theory Holdsworth 62,Six types- Nicols +2 Reviewed 1,000 patients Anterior- vertebral body, ALL, PLL Supports compressi

12、ve loads Posterior- facets, arch, Inter-spinous ligamentous complex Resists tensile stresses Stressed importance of posterior elements If destabilized, must consider surgery,Posterior,Anterior,Anatomic Classification 3 Column Theory Denis 83,Based on radiographic review of 412 cases 5 types, 20 subt

13、ypes Anterior- ALL , anterior 2/3 body Middle - post 1/3 body, PLL Posterior- all structures posterior to PLL Same as Holdsworth Posterior injury-not sufficient to cause instability,Anterior,Middle,Posterior,McAfee Classification,Six typesCT based-100 patientsMiddle column most important,Load Sharin

14、g Classification McCormack, Spine 1994,Review of injuries fixed posteriorly (McCormack 94) Which failed? Could they be prevented? Suggests when to go anteriorly,Morphologic Classification,1930,40,50,60,70,80,90,2000,10,CT evolved,MRI evolved,*,Post elements important,2 column,3 column, McAfee,Mechan

15、istic classifications,Load Sharing,Load Sharing Classification (McCormack 94),Devised method of predicting posterior failure 1-3 points assigned to the variables below Sum the points for a 3-9 scale 6 points anterior,Comminution,Fragment Displacement,Kyphosis correction,30%,30-60%,60%,0-1mm,1-2mm,2m

16、m,3,4-9,10,Mechanistic Classification AO,Review of 1445 cases (Magerl, Gertzbein et al. European Spine Journal 1994) Based on direction of injury force 3 types,53 injury patterns Type A - Compression Type B - Distraction Type C - Rotational,Morphologic Classification,1930,40,50,60,70,80,90,2000,10,C

17、T evolved,MRI evolved,*,Post elements important,2 column,3 column, McAfee,Mechanistic classifications,Load Sharing,AO,Increasing severity,AO Mechanistic Classification Complex subdivisions to include most fractures,Classification of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures: problems of reproducibility A

18、study of 53 patients using CT and MRI,Oner, European Spine Journal 200253 PatientsAO & Denis Classifications5 observers Cohen Test0 = No Agreement1.0 = Perfect Agreement,Results,AO Interobserver CT 0.31 MRI 0.28 CT/MRI 0.47Denis Interobserver CT 0.60 MRI 0.52,Vaccaro, A.R. et al, Spine 2005,Spine Tr

19、auma Study Group Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Scale (TLICS) Three Part Description,Injury Morphology,Neurologic Status,Integrity of PLC,Injury Morphology,Compression: prefix-axial, lateral, flexion,postfix-burstDistraction: prefix-extension, flexionpostfix-compression, burst Tran

20、slation/Rotation: prefix-flexionpostfix-compression, burst,Neurologic Status,Intact Nerve Root Injury Cauda Equina Injury Cord Injury-Incomplete, Complete,Posterior Ligamentous Complex,Not disrupted in tension Disrupted in tension,Treatment Spine Trauma Severity Score Determined by:,Injury Morpholog

21、y Neurology Ligamentous Integrity,Vaccaro, A.R. et al., J. Spinal Disorders & Techniques 2005,Point System,Compression fx Axial, Flexion 1 Burst - add 1,Distraction injury 4,Translation /,Rotation 3,Injury Morphology Select one,Neurology-Point System,Cauda equina,Cord And conus medullaris,Incomplete

22、,Complete,Nerve root,3,3,2,2,Intact 0,Posterior Soft Tissue Point System,PLC(displaced in tension),Evaluated by MRI, CT, Plain X-rays, Exam,Intact 0,Injured 3,Suspected/ Indeterminant 2,MODIFIERS,AS/ DISH/Metabolic bone disease Nonbraceable Sternal fracture Multiple rib fractures at same or adjacent

23、 levels as fracture Multiple trauma Coronal plane deformity Burns at site of anticipated incision,Next Step - Direct TX,Assign Points,Conservative,Surgery,Treatment,Injuries with 3 points or less = non operative Injuries with 4 points=Nonop vs Op Injuries with 5 points or more = surgery,Examples Fle

24、xion Compression Fx,Flexion compression (morphology) - 1 Intact (neurology) - 0 PLC (ligament) no injury - 0,Total 1 points- Non Op,Compression Burst Fracture,Flexion compression burst - 2 Intact ( neurology) - 0 PLC (ligament) no injury (0),Total 2 points-Non Op,Compression Burst-Complete Neuro Inj

25、ury,Axial compression burst with distraction posterior ligamentous complex -4 Complete (neurology) - 2 PLC (ligament) injury - 3,Total 9 points-Surgery,Compression Burst-Complete injury,Axial compression burst-2 Complete (neurology)-2 PLC (ligament) Intact-0Points 4-Non Op vs Op,Translational/Rotati

26、on Injury,Distraction, Translation/rotational, compression injury - 4 Complete (neurology) 2 PLC injury - 3,Total 9 points-Surgery,Surgical Decision making based off tenets of classification system Injury morphology Neurological status PLC integrity/injury stability,Journal of Spinal Disorders & Tec

27、hniques, 2006,Reliability/treatment validity at single institution Treatment validity exceptional- 96.4% Moderate agreement for PLC (66%) and mechanism (60%),Spine, 2006,Conflict: Mechanism vs Morphology,The Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques,Identifying objective findings on imaging studies

28、 and clinical examination instead of guessing injury mechanisms provides more valid understanding of injury classification,Problems Inter-rater agreement on sub-scores was: Lowest for mechanisms followed by PLC Highest for neurological status Substantial for the management recommendation,J. Neurosur

29、gery Spine, 2006,The Spine Journal, 2006,Status PLC Most reliable indicators: Vertebral body translation on plain radiographs Disrupted PLC components on T1 sagittal MRI Focal kyphosis in absence of vertebral body injury,Assessment of Injury to the PLC in the Setting of on Normal Plain Radiographs L

30、ee, J., Vaccaro, A.R. et al. J Orthopaedic Trauma 2006 Validation Study J. Orthopaedic Research Submitted 2006,STATUS PLC Disrupted PLC components i.e. ISL, SSL, LF; black stripe on T1 sagittal MRI , most important factor Diastasis of the facet joints on CT Fat suppressed T2 sagittal MRI,IMPACT OF E

31、XPERIENCE (attending surgeons, fellows, residents, and non-surgeon health care professionals). Most reliable among spine fellows, followed by attending spine surgeons.,Lim, Coluna/Columna Journal, 2006,IMPACT OF TRAINING Management component: reliability rose from = 0.46 (r=0.47) on first assessment

32、 to = 0.72 (r=0.91) on the 2nd assessment.,Spine, 2007,DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SPECIALTIES Inter-rater reliability: “injury mechanism” higher in neurosurgeons Assessment of PLC, neurological status- higher in orthopaedic surgeons Reliability total score/management recommendations similar Overall, differ

33、ences subtle,J Spinal Disorders, 2006,DIFFERENCES IN NATIONALITIES Inter-rater reliability for mechanism higher among non-US surgeons Reliability for PLC, neurological status, management higher among US surgeons,World J Emerg Surg, 2007,Management of Thoracic and Lumbar Injuries,CONTROVERSIAL!,Non-O

34、perative Treatment of Thoracic Spine Injuries,Brace or Cast Treatment Compression Fractures Stable Burst Fractures Pure Bony Flexion-Distraction Injury,85 pts reviewed to determine late outcome of non-op management Chronic pain predominant in 69.4% 25% of subjects had changed jobs (most full to part

35、) 48% of subjects filed lawsuits concerning injuryPain intensity correlated with angle of kyphosis But not w/magnitude of anterior column deformityBed rest alone adequately manages traumatic, uncomplicated thoracolumbar wedge fractures,Folman and Gepstein, J Orthop Trauma, 2003,No correlation was fo

36、und between radiological progressive in 3-column Significant remodeling of canal encroachment (CE) proportional to initial amount of CE but not related to age & radiology,Agus, Eur J Spine, 2005,Evaluated 29 pts with 2- or 3-column-injured thoracolumbar burst fractures,62% showing good or excellent

37、outcome 38% showing moderate or poor outcome Significant effects on clinical outcome: Load-sharing classification, posttraumatic kyphosis & overall lumbopelvic lordosis Surgical reconstruction appropriate treatment in more severe fractures,Koller, Eur Spine J, 2008,Evaluated 21 pts; 9.5 yr f/u,Surgi

38、cal Management of Thoracolumbar Injuries,Unstable burst fractures Purely ligamentous Facet dislocations Translational injuries Neurologic deficit,Delayed diagnosis in 28 pts (19%) Differences b/w surgical & non: in pulmonary complications & length of hospital stay in non-op pts. Surgical pts had hig

39、hly significantly less pain Radiographic studies should be performed Choice of treatment in pts with multiple injuries is not different from that in pts with no asscd injuries,Dai, J Trauma, 2004,147 pts w/acute thoracolumbar fractures: 1988 to 1997 Min. 3yr f/u; 4 pts died during hospital stay,Lack

40、 of evidence demonstrating superiority of one approach over the other No evidence linking posttraumatic kyphosis to clinical outcomes Strong need for improved clinical research methodology to be applied to this patient population,Thomas, J Neurosurg Spine, 2006,Evaluated scientific literature on ope

41、rative & non-op treatments,Reviewed 37 pts Accuracy of plain radiographs improved w/experience of observers Impact of disagreement on treatment plan was significant Plain radiography alone is not adequate,Dai, Spine, 2008,Extended anterolateral fixation is biomechanically comparable to circumferenti

42、al fusion Extension of anterior instrumentation & fusion 1-level above and below the unstable segment can result in near equivalent stability to a 2-stage circumferential procedure,Acosta, J Neurosurg Spine, 2008,Biomechanical comparison of 3 fixation techniques for unstable thoracolumbar fractures.

43、 Induced at L1:1) Short-segment anterolateral fixation2) Circumferential fixation3) Extended anterolateral fixation,Angular stable plate system showed higher primary and secondary stability In specimens with lower BMD, the use of angular stable systems substantially increased stability,Disch, Spine,

44、 2008,Difficult to establish the ideal surgical approach Anterior decompression assocd w/ recovery of motor strength pain & improve neuro status Stand-alone anterior constructs: complications & likely to have revision More definite evidence required to determine best surgical strategy,Whang, J Am Ac

45、ad Orthop Surg, 2008,Conclusions on Treatment,Surgically treating incomplete neuro deficits potentiates improvement and rehabilitation Complete neuro deficits may benefit from operative treatment to allow mobilization Little chance of developing neuro deficits with nonoperative treatment,Surgery: An

46、terior versus Posterior,Anterior More predictable decompression Saves levels Questionable improved recovery of neuro function Gertzbein,1992 may be indicated in bladder dysfunction McAfee, 1985 neuro recovery in 70 patients,Posterior Less morbidity Failures with short segment constructs Usually requ

47、ires more levels Less blood loss Transpedicular anterior column bone grafting may protect posterior construct,Thank You,Bibliography,Meyer PR Jr, Sullivan DE. Injuries to the spine. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1984 May;2(2):313-29. Mackersie RC, Shackford SR, Garfin SR, Hoyt DB. Major skeletal injuries

48、 in the obtunded blunt trauma patient: a case for routine radiologic survey J Trauma. 1988 Oct;28(10):1450-4. Bohler L. Die techniek de knochenbruchbehandlung imgrieden und im kriege. Verlag von Wilhelm Maudrich 1930 (in German) Bohler L. Mechanisms of fracture and dislocation of the spine in the tr

49、eatment of fractures. 5 th English ed. Fractures and dislocation of the spine. Bohler L, editor. Vol. 1. Grune and Straton, Inc: New York; 1956. p. 300-29. Watson-Jones R. The results of postural reduction of the fractures of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 20 (3): 567. Nicoll EA. Fracture-dislocati

50、on of the dorsolumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1949;31:376-394. Holdsworth F. W. The Spinal Cord. Basic Aspects and Surgical Considerations. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1962 44-B: 968-969. Kelly and T.E. Whitesides, Jr., Treatment of lumbodorsal fracture-dislocations. Ann Surg 167 (1968), pp. 705709. D

51、enis F. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine. 1983 Nov-Dec;8(8):817-31. McAfee PC, Yuan HA, Fredrickson BE, Lubicky JP. The value of computed tomography in thoracolumbar fractures. An analysis of one hundred consecutive cases

52、 and a new classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983 Apr;65(4):461-73. Ferguson RL, Allen BL Jr. A mechanistic classification of thoracolumbar spine fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984 Oct;(189):77-88. McCormack T, Karaikovic E, Gaines RW. The load sharing classification of spine fractures. Spin

53、e. 1994 Aug 1;19(15):1741-4. Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Harms J, Nazarian S. A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J. 1994;3(4):184-201. ner, FC, Ramos, LM, Simmermacher, RK, Kingma, PT, Diekerhof, CH, Dhert, WJ et al. (2002) “Classification of thoracic and l

54、umbar spine fractures: problems of reproducibility: a study of 53 patients using CT and MRI“ Eur Spine J 11: 235-45 Vaccaro, AR, Zeiller, SC, Hulbert, RJ, Anderson, PA, Harris, M, Hedlund, R et al. (2005) “The thoracolumbar injury severity score: a proposed treatment algorithm“ J Spinal Disord Tech

55、18: 209-15 Vaccaro AR, Lim MR, Hurlbert RJ, Lehman RA Jr, Harrop J, Fisher DC, Dvorak M, Anderson DG, Zeiller SC, Lee JY, Fehlings MG, Oner FC; Spine Trauma Study Group. Surgical decision making for unstable thoracolumbar spine injuries: results of a consensus panel review by the Spine Trauma Study

56、Group. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006 Feb;19(1):1-10. Vaccaro AR, Baron EM, Sanfilippo J, Jacoby S, Steuve J, Grossman E, DiPaola M, Ranier P, Austin L, Ropiak R, Ciminello M, Okafor C, Eichenbaum M, Rapuri V, Smith E, Orozco F, Ugolini P, Fletcher M, Minnich J, Goldberg G, Wilsey J, Lee JY, Lim MR, Bur

57、ns A, Marino R, DiPaola C, Zeiller L, Zeiler SC, Harrop J, Anderson DG, Albert TJ, Hilibrand AS. Reliability of a novel classification system for thoracolumbar injuries: the Thoracolumbar Injury Severity Score. Spine. 2006 May 15;31(11 Suppl):S62-9; discussion S104. Anand N MD, Vaccaro AR MD, Lim MR

58、 MD, Lee JY MD, Arnold P MD, Harrop JS MD, Ratlif J MD, Rampersaud R MD, Bono CM MD. Evolution of Thoracolumbar Trauma Classification Systems: Assessing the Conflict Between Mechanism and Morphology of Injury. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Volume 12, Number 1/Summer 2006 - Acute SCI Ma

59、nagement: Basic Science and Nonoperative Care: 70-78. Schweitzer KM Jr, Vaccaro AR, Lee JY, Grauer JN; Spine Trauma Study Group. Confusion regarding mechanisms of injury in the setting of thoracolumbar spinal trauma: a survey of The Spine Trauma Study Group (STSG). J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006 Oct;19(

60、7):528-30. Harrop JS, Vaccaro AR, Hurlbert RJ, Wilsey JT, Baron EM, Shaffrey CI, Fisher CG, Dvorak MF, Oner FC, Wood KB, Anand N, Anderson DG, Lim MR, Lee JY, Bono CM, Arnold PM, Rampersaud YR, Fehlings MG; Spine Trauma Study Group. Intrarater and interrater reliability and validity in the assessmen

61、t of the mechanism of injury and integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex: a novel injury severity scoring system for thoracolumbar injuries. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting On Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2005. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006 Feb;4(2):118-22.

62、Vaccaro AR, Lee JY, Schweitzer KM Jr, Lim MR, Baron EM, Oner FC, Hulbert RJ, Hedlund R, Fehlings MG, Arnold P, Harrop J, Bono CM, Anderson PA, Anderson DG, Harris MB, Spine Trauma Study Group . Assessment of injury to the posterior ligamentous complex in thoracolumbar spine trauma. Spine J. 2006 Sep

63、-Oct;6(5):524-8. Epub 2006 Jul 11. Lee JY; Vaccaro AR; Schweitzer KM; Lim MR; Baron EM; Rampersaud R; Oner F C; Hulbert R J; Hedlund R; Fehlings MG; Arnold P; Harrop J; Bono CM; Anderson PA; Patel A; Anderson D G; Harris MB Assessment of injury to the thoracolumbar posterior ligamentous complex in t

64、he setting of normal-appearing plain radiography. The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society 2007;7(4):422-7. Lim M, Vaccaro AR, Lee J, Jacoby S, SanFilippo J, Oner FC, Hulbert J, Fehlings M, Arnold P, Harrop J, Bono C, Anderson P, Anderson DG, Baron E. The Thoracolumba

65、r Injury Severity Scale and Score (TLISS): Inter-physician and inter-disciplinary validation of a new paradigm for the treatment of thoracolumbar spine trauma, Coluna/Columna (Brazil), 5(3):157-64, 2006. Patel AA, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ, Hilibrand AS, Harrop JS, Anderson DG, Sharan A, Whang PG, Poels

66、tra KA, Arnold P, Dimar J, Madrazo I, Hegde S. The adoption of a new classification system: time-dependent variation in interobserver reliability of the thoracolumbar injury severity score classification system. Spine. 2007 Feb 1;32(3):E105-10. Raja Rampersaud Y, Fisher C, Wilsey J, Arnold P, Anand

67、N, Bono CM, Dailey AT, Dvorak M, Fehlings MG, Harrop JS, Oner FC, Vaccaro AR. Agreement between orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons regarding a new algorithm for the treatment of thoracolumbar injuries: a multicenter reliability study.J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006 Oct;19(7):477-82. Ratliff J, Anand N

68、, Vaccaro AR, Lim MR, Lee JY, Arnold P, Harrop JS, Rampersaud R, Bono CM, Gahr RH; Trauma Study Group Spine. Regional variability in use of a novel assessment of thoracolumbar spine fractures: United States versus international surgeons. World J Emerg Surg. 2007 Sep 7;2:24. Bracken MB, Shepard MJ, C

69、ollins WF, Holford TR, Young W, Baskin DS, Eisenberg HM, Flamm E, Leo-Summers L, Maroon J, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of methylprednisolone or naloxone in the treatment of acute spinal-cord injury. Results of the Second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. N Engl J Med. 1990 May 17;32

70、2(20):1405-11. Folman Y, Gepstein R. Late outcome of nonoperative management of thoracolumbar vertebral wedge fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2003 Mar;17(3):190-2. Au H, Kayali C, Arslanta M. Nonoperative treatment of burst-type thoracolumbar vertebra fractures: clinical and radiological results of 29 p

71、atients. Eur Spine J. 2005 Aug;14(6):536-40. Epub 2004 May 28. Koller H, Acosta F, Hempfing A, Rohrmller D, Tauber M, Lederer S, Resch H, Zenner J, Klampfer H, Schwaiger R, Bogner R, Hitzl W. Long-term investigation of nonsurgical treatment for thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures: an outcome an

72、alysis in sight of spinopelvic balance. Eur Spine J. 2008 Aug;17(8):1073-95. Epub 2008 Jun 25. Dai LY, Yao WF, Cui YM, Zhou Q. Thoracolumbar fractures in patients with multiple injuries: diagnosis and treatment-a review of 147 cases. J Trauma. 2004 Feb;56(2):348-55. Thomas KC, Bailey CS, Dvorak MF,

73、Kwon B, Fisher C. Comparison of operative and nonoperative treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures in patients without neurological deficit: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006 May;4(5):351-8. Dai LY, Wang XY, Jiang LS, Jiang SD, Xu HZ. Plain radiography versus computed tomography scans

74、 in the diagnosis and management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Spine. 2008 Jul 15;33(16):E548-52. Acosta FL Jr, Buckley JM, Xu Z, Lotz JC, Ames CP. Biomechanical comparison of three fixation techniques for unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures. Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008

75、Apr;8(4):341-6. Disch AC, Knop C, Schaser KD, Blauth M, Schmoelz W. Angular stable anterior plating following thoracolumbar corpectomy reveals superior segmental stability compared to conventional polyaxial plate fixation. Spine. 2008 Jun 1;33(13):1429-37. Whang PG, Vaccaro AR. Thoracolumbar fractur

76、es: anterior decompression and interbody fusion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008 Jul;16(7):424-31. Gertzbein SD, Crowe PJ, Fazl M, Schwartz M, Rowed D. Canal clearance in burst fractures using the AO internal fixator. Spine. 1992 May;17(5):558-60. McAfee PC, Bohlman HH. Complications following Harrington instrumentation for fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985 Jun;67(5):672-86.,

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 医学治疗 > 骨科学

本站链接:文库   一言   我酷   合作


客服QQ:2549714901微博号:道客多多官方知乎号:道客多多

经营许可证编号: 粤ICP备2021046453号世界地图

道客多多©版权所有2020-2025营业执照举报