1、The reading passage and the professor are both talking about whether medical information should be recored by electrical edition instead of the hard copies. The author mentions three benefits of using electronic medical record, yet the professor states that the metrits of the adoption of electronic
2、record system are not certain.The author cites that electronic records can help us save a lot of money and space. We do not have to use paper to record the medical information, which means we can simply duplicate and transfer it instead of copy and fax it. However, the professor mentions that the us
3、e of electronic record will not cut the cost, because we still need to use the emergency backup and the signature, that is to say, the cost still exists.The author also cites that by using electronic records, people could prevent a lot of handwriting errors, which might cause serious bad impact on t
4、he patient. But, the professor says that even thouth we use the electronic records, those errors still exists, because we could not prevent the man-made mistakes and some of the errors might caused by some staff instead of the doctors. Maybe the electronic records are just typed into the system by t
5、he staff long after the doctor finished writing them down, so in the process the staff will probably misinterpret the meaning on the hard copied.The author asserts that the electronic records can help medical research by using its huge database, so the information could be easily accessed from any p
6、lace, yet the professor points out that people will still hard to access the data they are searching for because in the USA, there are very strict privacy laws to protect the patients private information. So, if they want to get into that system, they need to get a mountain of permissions. And the doctor can block the files for any purpose, so the records are not accessed for granted.总结：1. 我不知道为什么我这篇综合打了 330words 但我觉得我还是在这上面浪费了一些时间，所以我在检查 typo 的时候没那么认真2. R2 这里有个细节是 医生需要用 pen and paper while examining the patient 我没写进去
