1、9 4589 7PM/P cI|.$l .$ it is uncertain whether topics, grounds or tags will appear in one metaphor at the same time; it is universal that a metaphor nested in another metaphor or inherited in another metaphor. Then troubles and possible solutions in metaphor computation are discussed. Key words: Met
2、aphor understanding Linguistic Metaphor Metaphor nesting Corpus analysis 1 M WB1 m YV Y s YV7r M Y M “b Lakoff Johnson (1980)“d4 Q | $ o A is Bp TV7 8 T+b 7 Cii“ T 1b Q K YV Vr 8CyNB S1V s 7 S s b B VrZ 7i | 31YA+9V71 s Vr Q WV Zhou et al. 200714 s Ib 2 T _ T+b n5 1 S * O M XY Y J Y P ! Y Y B t+C 2b
3、 1 +yN K1 Vr Q W1“ 1s uY1 b1% F1 Z 7sb Goatly3|B /+Fs 8Topic L= 8Vehicle 8 Ground88? 3 1 H M 1+ S:MarkS M M az a b il 31T 88 vsb Q O/8a8 ? 3 1 C L W Qb 7 88 QWiB 1“ o G p so poG p7 Q 85 T Qop8 T Qo pb s1BV Vr QV | Vr o Q (Conceptual metaphor)pM uY Steen 1994 Deignan(2005)| T o linguistic metaphorp4b
4、 N9 Steen Deignano plB Q 8a8M uY | 8a8o8po8popV7ZLVr O =) s T+ H ? Q QM uYbm 14V U Q Wq T+# Y 460 uY1 b m 1 Q 1“ Fig.1 The relation between linguistic metaphor and conceptual metaphor “B n5V3 Vr 7 Ss T Vr 88a8aO M?7YV VV8a8w 8a8 Q K Q # ils db 3 1 ) 7 V1 p V9 yN Vr91 T Q B“ B T+bV l AB s8a8a S:b “)
5、b a Qil C V s A b Vr 8ls Vr T L= C + vGb V ? q os# 1000 s1“+“s Vr T Z 1+ 1s| sC 3* Rb q o0 v 9 L i b o (K1uv M o = E paa6 a N 5b 4 | VMb oZ Ti%9 cB 3d q C o V Zi9 s Wn IDb W 31“ 88 S: T 8 8 Q L8 _ _ 31 q T+# Y 4613.1 1s | Fs8a8a# S: il MM1 8a8 TY Q s Q4 |b o |p t s V t b YV/ b :k b/ * 0 B b “8 T VB
6、Vs#V Q A I n5Bb 3.2 sC 8 VrBnC ?F aaa a S: b a ? 3 s 8 b L= V A“ 8AC 8a# S: V 8 9 B 8a S:C byN T 6B VB , sC b “B CVCB1Z BC f 9 R 7 35 8 f / MYilw b 3.3 3* R - M1 3* $ Cb L= ?C 3*Cd RX j5b 3.3.1 3* 3* B i 6B 4 B T 8a8 &9 B bV f/ 3*1? 38b fB 2B 0b q K Fb b 8sY o 2B 0 pao K F pao p 7V B o 2p 0o pc Fo p
7、9b At8 W_8 Qi O“W_ YV 6B b“ f / 8 Q 3AYV8 dl ?b 3.3.2 B - 5CB T ! -4 “ i?ZT ! -4 * ilN 3 6BM1 b C nb q T+# Y 463 F V F1- I 2 T *t FY ?TElb * / lY0 v B# y b 3B ( A mJ R b V ( T V ABs B 7 s 5 Bs 3 TX ! -4 YV 6 Vr il b V 1000 = Tq d9s 3*C? 3 qr 30%+Y o A Bp O A B 0 3*Cr 40% Cr 70%b 3*C B1VC 7 s H$ bB T
8、 Vr Mv1 yN 1 s VE 1 3*C I nb 4 ) # Y TB RC VC T“l1“ il ! “1Tb TV j A Vr T+s5A1b | ss T Q Qi W uY “ 1 MYs Q sdlVb T s s T$ “ - z %yNV L= ? VC T+S s B 31Y TiW%) Z 1s | a sC # 3*C Rb Ts1 4“ 4 L= 1 P47/byN Tv.d ?1 )ZE kmy o8a8Mped9E 1 MY#w + Yb * V CVC Ts Ma V9 9 A1b7“B s51 I T+ $Y C ?(? O MW 1 V7 pV9 T
9、 bBsT| Bb ID : 1 ZHOU Chang Le, YANG Yun , HUANG Xiao-xi. Computational mechanisms for metaphor in languages:a survey J. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2007, 22(2):308-319. q T+# Y 4642 . q1B D. 0 : 0 v“ 2005. 3 Goatly, A. The language of metaphorsM. London: Routledge , 1997. 4 Deignan, ALICE. Metaphor and Corpus LinguisticsM. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2005. 5 t , , . _ 9 oy ! J. 9 , 2007, 1(1):142-146. Te o0 v ? S/ “p V 31Z_q a9 1 ) b
