1、Phased PPAP Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)阶段性生产件批准程序（PPAP）常见问题Q: How can I obtain copies of the Phased PPAP manual and Capacity Verification documentation?A: Information is available at: FSP: https:/ and FSN: https:/. 问: 我怎样才能得到阶段性生产件批准程序（PPAP）手册和生产能力验证文件副本?答: 通过以下网站可获取相关信息：FSP：https:/ rvlet/PostB
2、ulletin?action=viewBulletin&bulletinID=1964 和 FSN：https:/。Q: Are suppliers still required to update the EASI system or will tracking take place in CMMS3?A: The EASI system will be phased out over the two years, and replaced by a modified version of CMMS3 that will include dates, etc., for PSW. PSW a
3、nd parts progress tracking will take place in CMMS3 going forward. Once an EASI user is transitioned to CMMS3, they should continue all parts progress in CMMS3. There will also be on-line training for these changes.问： 供应商是否还需要对 EASI 系统进行更新？在 CMMS3 中是否将进行跟踪？答： EASI 系统将在两年内逐步废除，代之以改良后的 CMMS3 系统。CMMS3
4、系统将包含零件提交保证书（PSW）的日期等内容，并进行 PSW 和零件进度跟踪。EASI 用户一旦转而使用 CMMS3，他们应该在 CMMS3 中继续跟踪所有零件进度。针对这些变化，还将举行在线培训。Q: Does Phased PPAP allow me to PPAP tools as they become available for production or do I have to continue with the current requirement to PPAP all tools at the same date? If yes, can I submit an inv
5、oice for the Tooling as approved?A: PPAP is completed on a part number, not to a tool. The intention of Phased PPAP is to help manage the progress to full PSW completion Full PSW is completed when all tools / lines / cavities supports that launch. Completion of your first tool / line / cavity is a P
6、hase 1 completion. This provides Ford with the information that you can produce quality parts but do not have all tools / lines / cavities completed.No change in Tooling fund release is planned. Tooling funds would normally be released at Phase 2 completion (completion of PSW). There has been some t
7、hought given to an earlier release of a portion of Tooling funding for programs where multiple production lines will be used, but no action is currently planned.问： PPAP 工具可用于生产时，阶段性 PPAP 是否允许我使用这些工具？我是否应继续遵循当前 PPAP 所有工具的现行要求？如果是，我能否提交一份经批准的工装清单？答： PPAP 是按零件号完成，不是按工装。阶段性 PPAP 的目的在于协助管理全面 PSW 的完成进度。所有
8、的工具/ 生产线 /模腔都支持该投产工作时，就完成了全面 PSW。第一次的工具/生产线/模腔的完成即阶段 1 的完成。对福特而言，这意味着你能够生产出优质的零件，但不是所有的工具/ 生产线 /模腔都已经完成。工装费用发放方面，计划没有发生改变。工装费用通常在完成第二阶段（完成 PSW）时发放。曾经考虑过在使用多条生产线的项目中提前发放部分工装费，但目前尚无具体计划。Q: Can a supplier PPAP parts produced at a tool shop?A: No, parts must be produced at the actual production source.问
9、： 供应商 PPAP 的零件能否在模具厂生产？答： 不能。零件必须在实际生产基地进行生产。Q: What constitutes “Permission to Ship“ at our supplier locations? If a part has an “Alert“ how do we use Phase PPAP that does not allow approval with alerted commodities?A: Permission to ship is given upon completion of full PSW (Phase 2) or as long as
10、the part is shipping under an approved WERS alert. If a part has not completed full PSW, it must ship under an alert. The benefit of Phased PPAP is that it quickly highlights supplier status in PSW completion. Phase 1 completion, while it is not fully PSWd, indicates that the supplier has completed
11、16 of 19 elements and can ship quality parts that can be used for production on non-salable units. However, Phase 1 parts since they have not completed full PSW, must ship under an alert.问： 在我们的供应商场所，怎样获得发货许可？如果一个零件存在 Alert，我们对于不予批准的 Alert 零件怎样使用阶段性 PPAP？答： 只有达到全面 PSW （第二阶段），或该零件在 WERS 发布了 Alert 的情况
12、下发货时，才可获得发货许可。如果某零件没有完成全面 PSW，该零件则必须在 Alert 条件下才可发货。阶段性 PPAP 的好处在于它能迅速的反映出供应商的 PSW 状态。完成第一阶段，但未达到全面 PSW，说明供应商已经完成了 19 个中的 16 个要素，并能生产出用于非卖品车辆生产的优质零件了。然而，因为没有完成全面 PSW，第一阶段产出的零件必须在Alert 的条件下方可发货。Q: Some suppliers are ready to PSW prior to 1PP but have no knowledge of the Phase PPAP process or use of C
13、MMS. Many STA engineers also do not have any information on how to access CMMS3. How do we handle this? Do we PSW in EASI?A: You are ok to PSW in EASI. As the pilot is rolled out, EASI and CMMS3 will trade information via a data bridge that will update nightly. However, once a supplier user is train
14、ed and migrated to CMMS3, they should do all of their parts progress PSW work in CMMS3. This approach was taken for the supplier users, to help reduce confusion by allowing them to transition fully to CMMS3 and not have to operate in two separate systems. Phased PPAP is currently being piloted with
15、suppliers on the P221 program. In this pilot, EASI and CMMS3 will trade all part information for a period of time until CMMS3 takes over - because of this data bridge, non-P221 parts will be also able to be progressed in CMMS3. As for training, Phased PPAP and CMMS3 training is well underway for STA
16、 engineers, and suppliers are being trained on-line. Upon completion of supplier training, and readiness to use CMMS3 Vehicle Parts Progress tool (VPP), suppliers should begin doing all of their PSW work in CMMS3.问： 有些供应商在 1PP 前就已经准备好了 PSW，但并不了解阶段性 PPAP 流程或 CMMS 的使用。许多 STA 工程师也不知道如何访问 CMMS3。对此应如何处理？
17、我们是否在 EASI 中做 PSW？答： 可以在EASI 中进行 PSW。试用结束后，EASI 和CMMS3 将通过一个每夜更新的数据桥交换信息。然而，一旦供应商用户经培训后被移植到CMMS3，他们就应该在CMMS3 中完成零件进度的所有PSW工作。本方法可允许供应商用户完全移植到 CMMS3，且不必同时在两个独立系统中操作，这样可以帮助减少移植过程中的混乱。目前P221项目的供应商正在试用阶段性PPAP。在试用中，EASI 和CMMS3将在一段时间内交换所有的零件信息，直至CMMS3将之取代因为这种数据的交换，非P221项目的零件也将在CMMS3中进行。至于培训，STA 工程师正在接受阶段性
18、 PPAP 和CMMS3培训，供应商则接受在线培训。供应商培训结束且准备好使用CMMS3整车项目计划工具（VPP）后，供应商应在CMMS3中开始他们所有的PSW 工作。Q: Do you lose your EASI access once youve completed the VPP training online? One of our people that took the training understood that to be the case. You can see how this will affect the ability to keep up with EASI
19、 until the rest of the programs migrate.A: Suppliers who complete the on-line training have their permission changed.with the same RACF and password they will be able to do ALL of their part progress and timing work in VPP and they will have “view only“ access in EASI. Once transitioned there should
20、 be NO need for a user to do any of their work in EASI 问： 结束VPP在线培训后是否就失去 EASI 访问权限？有一位接受过培训的职员就碰到过这种情况。你可以看到，剩余项目移植完毕之前，这种情况将极为影响我们维持EASI的能力。答： 完成在线培训的供应商许可权限已经改变使用相同的RACF和密码，他们可以进行VPP中所有零件进度和时间安排的工作，他们具有 EASI的“只读”访问权限。一旦开始移植，用户就没有必要在EASI处理任何工作了。Q: There is a requirement to answer timing in VPP wit
21、hin 24 hours after the parts arrive in the system. How stringent is this requirement? We already had a hard time with this trying to answer one date.three dates make it even tougher.A: Suppliers are required to provide part timing within 24 hours. For Phased PPAP, this requires promise dates for all
22、 3 phases. If you cannot meet the 24 hour requirement, simply input your PSW date information immediately when it becomes available. 问： 系统要求零件到达后 24小时内必须确定VPP中的时间安排。这一要求有多严厉？确定一个日期已经十分困难，确定三个日期更加困难。答： 供应商应在24小时内提供零件时间安排。对于阶段性PPAP，要求供应商对3个阶段的日期都做出承诺。如果你不能达到这一24小时的时限要求，请在准备好PSW 日期后，立即输入日期信息。Q: Has the
23、 transition been further developed? Currently my understanding is that the Phase PPAP process starts with P221, then continues with each subsequent Job#1 program. Does this mean running changes will not changeover until each of these subsequent programs hit Job#1? What about minor changes / refreshe
24、nings or added starters? A: Regarding implementation timing, it is planned to launch the phased PPAP process with supplier sites that are shipping to the P221 program. Once these supplier sites / users are migrated to CMMS3 VPP, they will do all of your PSW work in VPP. Following this the plan is to
25、 roll out to suppliers shipping to selected programs (with Job #1 dates after P221). If you do not supply to P221 you will then be migrated to the new approach on a targeted program with a Job 1 date later than P221. Once migrated to CMMS3 VPP, all required PSWs for running changes, minor / major pr
26、ograms will all be done with the Phased PPAP approach.问： 转换是否得到进一步发展？目前我的理解是：阶段性PPAP从P221项目开始，继之以每一个后续投产项目。这是否意味着，在每一个后续项目都完成投产工作前，持续性的改变不会发生？是否发生小的变化/更新或者新增的启动项目呢？答： 关于实施时间，计划在发货给P221项目的供应商场所启动阶段性PPAP流程。一旦这些供应商场所/用户被移植到CMMS3VPP，他们将负责VPP中所有的PSW 工作。随后的工作是供应商发货到选定项目 （包括P221后的投产日期）。如果不向P221供货，你将被移植到针对投
27、产日期迟于P221项目的目标项目的一个新方法。一旦被移植到CMMS3 VPP，所有持续性变化、大/小项目所需的 PSW将通过阶段性PPAP方法进行处理。Q: I dont see anything concerning SIM score consequences for late entry of dates or timing slips. How will the performance be tracked? How much damage will poorly managed dates do to the plant?A: Ford is currently in the ear
28、ly stages of revising SIM to reflect PSW missed commitments and slips that include Phased PPAP information, which includes integrating data feeds from the new CMMS3 VPP information source. As with all metrics in SIM, this is used as a record of supplier performance activity. However, PSW slips or mi
29、ssed commitments are currently not a part of the Q1 scoring system.问： 我发现延迟输入日期或时间安排不妥当并没有造成SIM 评分方面的不良后果。这方面的执行情况将如何得以跟踪？日期没有得到妥善管理将对工厂造成什么样的不良影响？答： 福特目前刚开始着手修改SIM，以争取反映供应商未能履行的PSW承诺以及阶段性PPAP信息提交的延误等情况，包括整合来自新的CMMS3 VPP信息源的数据。SIM的所有评估标准主要用于记录供应商的执行绩效。然而，目前PSW 延误或不能履行承诺等现象尚未纳入Q1评分系统。Q: The Launch Re
30、adiness Review documentation for P221 in Section 4 (Production Capacity) states that it is a requirement for High Impact Suppliers to perform Capacity Verification prior to 1PP. Doesnt this add significant systems cost?A: The generic Phased PPAP requirements are such that phase 3 (Capacity Verificat
31、ion) may be performed as late as 4 weeks prior to Job 1. After this, Capacity Verification will require a support plan to be input into CMMS3 VPP. However, it is important to note that program teams in special circumstances may modify these Capacity Verification requirements as necessary to meet the
32、ir business needs.问： 第四节中 （生产能力）的P221投产准备情况评审文件规定，高影响供应商必须在 1PP之前进行生产能力验证。这是否会大幅增加系统成本？答： 阶段性PPAP一般要求是，阶段 3（生产能力验证）可以推后至投产前4周进行。如再推后进行，生产能力验证需要一个支持计划，且该计划须输入CMMS3 VPP。然而，必须注意的是项目小组在特定环境中可以根据具体商务要求对生产能力验证的要求进行修改。Q: I thought that we needed to enter the exact CAPACITY NUMBER, not a 1. What is the diff
33、erence?A: Suppliers on the P221 program must input their demonstrated weekly capacity number into CMMS3. Part progress data that has been fed from EASI to CMMS3 is populating the Demonstrated Weekly capacity field with the digit 1 (one) to signify that this part information was fed from EASI. Becaus
34、e EASI does not have a line item for CV, the CV field in CMMS3 VPP had to be populated with a character when the data was transitioned. Only for parts where PSW was completed are we populating that field with a one.问： 我认为我们需要输入准确的生产能力值，而非一个“1”。两者有何区别？答： P221项目的供应商必须把他们已证实的周生产能力数值输入CMMS3。从EASI 输入到CMMS3的零件进度数据在已证实周生产能力域中用数字“1 ”表示，表明这一部分的信息来自EASI。因为EASI没有CV 的生产线条目，进行数据移植时，CV CMMS3 VPP的CV域必须输入一个字符。只有已完成PSW的零件，我们才在该域中输入一个 “1”。12/13/02
