1、Emerald 出版社 资源利用和国际期刊投稿建议,Agenda,Emerald 学术资源简介,国际期刊投稿建议,Emerald 学术基金支持,成立于1967年，来自百强之一Bradford University ，致力于管理学、经济学领域学术出版和支持 -全球超过4500家用户，其中： -世界TOP100商学院均有Emerald作者并使用Emerald资源 -58%全球五百强企业用户 -年下载量超过25,000,000 -中国200+高校用户 特点：国际化、独立化、细分化,About Emerald,268种 管理学领域出版期刊数量最多的单一机构 涵盖24个学科领域 管理学5大学科：管理科学
2、与工程 工商管理 公共管理图书情报学 农林经济管理 其他交叉学科和泛管理领域的期刊,Emerald 管理学期刊,Emerald推荐期刊-西安科技大学管理学院,Management Decision 管理决策 SSCI Chinese Management Studies 中国管理研究 SSCI Cross Cultural Management 跨文化管理 SSCI Managing Service Quality管理服务质量 SSCI Industrial Management & Data Systems工业管理与数据系统SCI,推荐期刊：,Emerald推荐期刊-西安科技大学管理学院,M
3、anagement Decision 管理决策 SSCI刊载与商业有关的理论、实践、决策等研究和思考稿源高端：著名的管理学哲学家、企业家选题范围：重大问题的深入研究、运作管理、企业财务管理、企业家精神、战略与决策问题、扭转公司危机的策略,重点推荐：,图书及电子系列丛书- CALIS,2000多种纸本图书 1000多卷电子系列丛书-近500册被BKCI检索 电子系列丛书含社会科学专集和工商管理与经济专集,Emerald 新兴市场案例集,亚、非、拉丁美洲、中东、东欧 包含案例和教学注释 同行专家评审 200+案例，每年100个新增，无下载次数限制,Emerald Management Review
4、,Emerald 管理学评论文摘库国际著名的管理学者和从业人士组成的评议委员会挑选300多种世界顶尖管理学期刊收录多达30,0000篇摘要，每月增加1300篇左右,Research starts from abstracts,Emerald资源,数据库访问方式,一、通过图书馆主页访问,二、通过访问,Conflict management,国际期刊投稿建议,投稿准备流程审稿及成功发表主编反馈/Voices from Editors,论文准备-以Emerald 投稿为例,1、选择一本目标期刊 关键词检索 2、浏览期刊主页 选题范围、写作指南、范文,标题: 最少的单词，表达最充分的意思Emerald
5、期刊一般要求论文题目不超过8个英文单词摘要：,论文准备-以Emerald 投稿为例,3、修改论文格式参考Author Guidelines,Milorad M. Novicevic, Mario Hayek, Tony Fang, (2011) “Integrating Barnards and contemporary views of industrial relations and HRM“, Journal of Management History, Vol. 17 Iss: 1, pp.126 - 138 Abstract Purpose The purpose of this p
6、aper is to juxtapose the contemporary views of industrial relations (IR) and human resource management (HRM) with the ideas expressed by Chester Barnard. Design/methodology/approach The paper analyzes Chester Barnards views along the four premises that underlie contemporary perspectives on the field
7、s of IR and HRM. Findings Barnards main points: that sincerity and honesty of management is crucial to developing an individual employees will to collaborate, and that collective cooperation is superior to collective bargaining are found to resonate well with the contemporary views and provide a cle
8、ar indication for Barnards preference of human resource perspective to the IR perspective. Practical implications This paper provides Barnards practical insights into why managing IR and HR by policies leads to poor management. Originality/value This paper is the first to recognize Barnards unique c
9、ontribution to contemporary perspectives on IR and HRM disciplines. Keywords: Employee relations, Human resource management, Industrial relations, Organizations,结构性摘要举例,关键词：数量限制，一般4-6个 论文类型：7种 （见右图） 正文：字数限制4,0006,000单词论文结构参考文献:,论文准备-以Emerald 投稿为例,Paper Type,Harvard style:哈佛格式，作者在正文中用圆括号注出所引用文献的作者和出版
10、年，在文后参考文献列表中提供所引文献的详细信息，参考文献列表以作者姓氏的字母顺序排序。 MLA (the Modern Language Association):美国现代语言协会制定的论文指导格式，一般偏重应用于人文科学领域。 APA(the American Psychological Association):美国心学会 所发的出版手册规定的格式要求，一般应用于心理学，教育学等。,参考文献举例-数量；时间；质量,A,F,4、准备Article title page-从Author guidelines 下载准备单独的文档提交 匿名评审论文所有作者信息、个人简介、以及论文题目和摘要等建议随
11、附上推荐信 ，应该包括2条有效信息：陈述为什么要向这本期刊投稿，如果您的文章与众不同，或者超出了期刊的范围 阐述本文是否引用或参考了与其主题相似但已发表在其他期刊上的论文恰当的推荐信应如此表述： I am submitting this article to Journal of Documentation. You will see that it deals with public library management, which I appreciate is outside JDocs normal scope. However, it focuses on the novel ap
12、plication of a theoretical model to the topic, and hence I think it is appropriate for JDoc. I am submitting an article with a similar title to Public Library Journal. However, that article gives a series of case studies, rather than describing and applying the model, and so is quite distinct from t
13、he paper submitted here. I can send a copy of the PLJ paper if required.不建议使用的推荐信: I am sending this article for you to publish in Journal of Documentation, after your editorial amendments. I have chosen JDoc to publish this paper, as it is a high-impact and well-regarded journal.,论文准备-以Emerald 投稿为例
14、,Article Title page & Covering Letter,论文准备 - 在线提交系统ScholarOne,5、选择正确投稿途径 Author GuidelinesScholarOne 在线提交系统Email 提交主编邮箱,论文准备 - 在线提交系统ScholarOne,论文评审状态示例:,论文审稿流程,审稿方式：两轮同行双盲评审 审稿周期： 从提交到收到初次反馈:33.5个月 发表周期3个月、1年不等 审稿结果： 拒绝 选题问题，改投其他期刊 修改根据评审意见进行修改、意见不同之处积极 与主编沟通 再次提交：修改时间，随附修改Notes,修改说明-Revision Notes
15、,Better grounding of the problem. Parts of the front-end of the paper read like a tutorial-like introduction of action research. In a rewrite, there are two things that I would like to see instead.I would expect a clearer attempt to establish the research-practice gap as an intellectual challenge. T
16、his is the main theme of the paper and it would therefore be useful to substantiate your understanding of this gap beyond the surface level.Next comment,You imply that you do not wish to see a tutorial to CAR (even though one reviewer thinks that this is needed since some sections of the MISQ reader
17、ship may not be familiar with CAR). We concur with you and have removed the tutorial aspects. The front end of the paper (pages 2-5) has been revised in order to outline the research and practical problems that we focused on.We agree that the research-practice gap needs to be positioned clearly as a
18、n intellectual challenge (as highlighted on page 3). We have now deliberately positioned the paper in this way with the challenge manifested in the action-research dichotomy, where either action or research tends to be the focus of action research projects (as explained on page 3). We also substanti
19、ate our arguments better in the broader CAR literature (as detailed from pages 5-14). Next response,123,Ref # Reviewer Comment,Author Response,论文发表-Author packs,一本纸本期刊,所有期刊电子版 3个月免费访问权,Literati network 评奖,Tips,无版面费、无审稿费 撰写正文前，可先向主编提交大纲或摘要，节省双方时间 英语语言很重要，合作作者、第三者评审 获取文中非原创文字、图标或图片的相关版权许可 文中表格需要单独文档提交
20、 ,供作者参考其他资源(),作者专栏,学者园地,Voices from editors,The authors from China do ignore the submission guidelines then try to negotiate the word length and other issues. This is difficult for editors. In several cases they have refused to shorten their papers to the 6,000 word limit. In one case an author said
21、 that if I wanted to cut the paper I could eliminate the references. This week I received a paper that was 20,000 words, and the author complained when I returned it. I let them know that the guidelines are not negotiable, but the Chinese authors are the only ones in the world that protest the reque
22、sts for changes. This has been very surprising.that we simply dont understand; following instructions (for example, structured abstract) is still a problem.the major issue relates to the fact that most papers do not contribute to the field and scope of the journal. Paper are either a plug and play (
23、replication of previous studies) , data crunching statistical analysis with no implications and/or papers that do not fit the scope of the journal,papers by Chinese authors are more likely to contain English grammar problems, not conform to the required research paper structure, are weak in research
24、 training and writing for international journals, lack a critical analysis of the related studies I suggest they always work with an experienced native speaking copy-editor, or better, a co-author experienced in publishing in high-level scientific journals. Another limitation of Chinese papers is th
25、at they often fail to provide a conceptual or theoretical basis for their hypotheses. Lack novel practical or theoretical contributions have weak English be methodologically simplistic replicate Western research findings in China without considering the indigenous Chinese context,Voices from Editors
26、,Voices from editors,I believe this is because there is a stress to people to publish in order to publish and not for conducting “innovative“ research Manuscripts from Asia in general, and China in particular are often more literature-driven than issue-driven.First let me say that we do not have hug
27、e numbers of submissions from China as we did in the past, because word has spread that we come down very hard on plagiarism. By this I mean that Chinese authors will sometimes review the literature on a specific topic or group of topics and develop hypotheses or models with the justification being
28、that the hypotheses or models proposed have never been proposed or tested. True, the hypotheses/models may be novel but this does not mean that they are worthwhile or make any meaningful contribution to theory or practice.,Emerald 学术支持,我们的发展与学科的进步息息相关 管理学研究基金：3000 图书馆学研究基金： 2000 优秀博士论文奖： 1500更多信息：
29、申请要求： 还未开始或正在进行的项目 项目组中至少包含一位常驻中国的公民在线提交材料 附信(Covering Letter):参与者姓名、联系方式、项目名称等 项目建议书(Proposal):2,000英文单词、目标、结果、效益、预算等 奖励：奖金+证书+CMS期刊访问权+IACMR会员一年优胜奖1名 2,000高度赞扬奖1-2名 500-1,000,Emerald 优秀博士论文奖,开始时间：每年4月份 奖项介绍：与EFMD(欧洲管理发展基金会)合作设立；Emerald出版社12个领域的12本期刊，参与组织此奖项； 申请要求：博士在读或者毕业两年内的研究人员http:/ 不超过1, 000单词的研究概要 详细说明函(Covering Letter): 描述被该奖项考虑的因素、发表的研究成果、其它相关信息等 来自导师或资深教师的推荐信 奖励：奖金+证书+研究成果推荐发表优胜奖1名 1,500高度赞扬奖2-3名 证书奖励,,期待与您合作，加入Emerald 成为作者、编委、评审人、主编！,如果您有任何疑问，欢迎您联系： Emerald 编辑支持主管 徐欢 Emerald 区域经理 饶先栋 电话：137 5221 7863 ,Thank You！,
