1、 , 480 ; SPSS16.0 199.70 ; , , , , ; ; ; ; , :450000, , :450000, , :450000, , :450000, , :2016xjxm434 The status quo of self-efficacy of pregnant women on late gestation and analysis of its influencing factors Hou Chenying He Xuejing Sun Man School of Nursing, Zhengzhou University; Abstract Objectiv
2、e:to explore the status quo of delivery self-efficacy of pregnant women on late gestation and its influencing factors, in order to provide the reference basis of enhancing delivery self-efficacy, reducing late gestation anxiety, and promoting natural birth rate.Methods:A total of 480 pregnant women
3、were investigated by the General information questionnaire, Delivery Self-efficacy Scale and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) .Data were analyzed by SPSS16.0 software.Results:The score of self-e points.The influencing factors were anxiety, educational background, knowledge degree of pregnancy and chi
4、ldbirth, whether participating lectures, the willingness of the second childbirth of first-time mother, childbirth experience of multipara, and childbirth knowledge were from the medical staff and hospital publicity materials.Conclusion:The level of delivery self-efficacy of pregnant women on late g
5、estation were in the medium level and affected by many factors.Nursing staff should help pregnant women through the nursing intervention measures to improve the influencing factors, maintain good emotion on delivery, and enhance their confidence in natural childbirth, thus improve the natural birth
6、rate. Keyword late gestation; self-efficacy; anxiety; influencing factor; (WHO) 15% 1 46.2%, 2 3 , Larsen 4 , 5 6 , , 7, , , , 1 1.1 2016 4 2016 11 480 : (1) (28 40 ) ; (2) ; (3) , ; (4) , : (1) ; (2) ; (3) ( ) ; (4) 1.2 1.2.1 (1) : , 13 , (2) (Childbirth Self-Efficacy Inventory) : 1993 Lowe 8 , 200
7、5 Ip 9 , 2008 10, 11 , 2 , (OE-SS) (SE-SS) , 16 , 32 , 10 , CBSEI 16 160 , 32 320 , (3) (Self-Rating Anxiety Scale, SAS) : 12 1971 1 , 20 , 4 (1 4 15 , 1 2 3 4 ; 5 ( 5 9 13 17 19 ) , 4 3 2 1 20 , ; 1.25 , , SAS 1350 , 50 59 , 60 69 , 70 1.2.2 , ; , , , , 1.2.3 SPSS 16.0 , , , t , Pearson P0.05 , P 2
8、 2.1 490 , 480 , 98% 282 (58.8%) , 198 (41.2%) ; 102 (21.2%) , 378 (78.8%) ; 20 2 5 9 6 (2 0.0%) , 2 6 3 0 1 9 5 (40.6%) , 31 35 144 (30.0%) , 36 40 36 (7.5%) , 41 9 (1.9%) ; 2 000 36 (7.5%) , 2 000 2 999 87 (18.1%) , 3000 3 999 144 (30.0%) , 4 000 4 999 87 126 (26.3%) ; 339 (70.6%) , 141 (29.4%) 2.
9、2 1 1 (n=480) 2.3 , 2 2 2.4 480 46.53 , 29 , 79 ; 117 (2 4.4%) , 3 3 (6.9%) , 3 (0.6%) ; 14 (n=1 158) (29.78 ) t , (t=44.12, P0.01) Pearson , 3 3 (r ) 3 , 40.6% 26 30 , ;30.0% 3 000 3 999 , ;73.8% , ;78.8% , 58.8% ; , 3.1 , 56.9% (199.70 ) 15 , , , , , , 16 , , , , , , , 3.2 (P0.05) , 43.8% ; , , 17
10、 , , , , , , , , , , , , 11.2%, 60.6%, 28.1%; , , , , 18 , , , , , , 17.1% ; , 63.1%, 19, , , , , , , , 55.3% , , , 20 , , 21 , 70.6% , , , , , , , 50% , , , ; , 22 , 23 , , , , 480 , 32.5%, , , , , , , , , , , , , 17.5%, , 63.1%, , , , , , , , 3.3 , 31.7%, (46.53 ) , 3 , (P0.05) , , 24 ; 25 , , , ,
11、 , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 1World Health Organization.Appropriate technology for birthJ.Lancet, 1985, 2:436-437. 2 , . J. , 2015, 02:97-100. 3 , . J. , 2015 (4) :46-47. 4 -efficacy expectanCIes and labor painJ.J Reprod Infant Psycho, 2001, 19 (3) :203-214. 5 . J. , 2014, (13) :1811-1812. 6 . J.
12、, 2015, 21 (2) :176-178. 7 . D. : , 2005:1. 8Lowe NK.Maternal confidence for labor:development of the Childbirth Self-Efficacy InventoryJ.Res Nuts Health, 1993, 16 (2) :141-149. 9Ip WY, Chan D, Chien WT.Chinese version of the Childbirth Selfefficacy InventoryJ.J Adv Nurs, 2005, 51 (6) :625-633. 10Ip
13、 WY, Chung TK, Tang CS.The Chinese Childbirth Self-Efficacy Inventory:the development of a short formJ.J Clin Nurs, 2008, 17 (3) :333-340. 11 . D. : , 2011:1. 12 . M. : , 1998:17-27. 13 , . J. , 2013 (24) :785-786. 14 . J. , 1993, ( ) :202-209. 15 , , . J. , 2014, 30 (9) :70-73. 16 . J. , 2016, 35 (1) :71-74. 17 .
