1、。、。D923 A 1007-6522 2018 03-0078-122017 7 20“”。“”“、”。、1、。、。、。、。2017 2。“”。2011 5 15。Si-ri、Contana。“30。”。2 XIV。“、。”3 66“”“”20。2 15 1 2017 5“”。“”“”。“”“、9 7 3 ”4。2“”Mracek v Bryn Mawr Hospital 5 34-35。“”402 A。6 48。、。、“”、。7。、。8“”9。“”。“。”。10 51“”。11。1 14。“8 0 8 2018 。”12“”“”。“”。10 52。13“persona ficta et r
2、apraesentata”。1900。“。”6 119-129 1“。”。“”“”6 119-129。13。“”。13。14 46。、。2。、。28 33。3 64-66。、。“”。“”。14 56-57 90 1“。”。15、“”。16 1 8 3 。78“。”、。17。“”。“”402 A。proximate cause。5 34-35。“”。78、。“”。18。2 8 2018 。1“”。19 2017 2 52“”。20 1。21 189。22。23。“”“”“”。21 18-22 Thrifty-Tel Inc v Bezenek。“”。、。18、8-18 8。2。59 f 3 8
3、3 electronicpersons。20 1“”。24。5 153。、。“”。25。1“。”。“”。26。27“”28“”。4 8 2018 、。29。、。“”。、。2。“”。“”。1。5 8 3 2 4 2 3 4。3。3 128“、。”128。“”。、。115。114。Siri“”。43 78。2“”。“”。“”。“”16 1“、。”、。34 2。34 2 6 8 2018 。“”。179“”。34 1。“”。“”。“”。、“”2016 2。3。2017 7“AI”Global AI DialogueSeries AI 20 AI。2。、。、。7 8 3 。1 J 2016 8 10-
4、11 2 M 2015 XIV 3 M/2002 4 N 2017-06-20 9 5 Ugo Pagallo The Laws of obots Crimes Contracts and Torts M Dordrecht Spring-er 2015 6 M 2003 7 M 2000 222 8 M 1991 28 9 J 2005 3 10-19 10 J 2004 4 51-57 11 M 2007 21-44 12、J 2006 4 44-53 13 M/1997 150-197 14 M 2012 15 M 2007 16 J 1995 2 9-17 17 Hutan Ashra
5、fian Artificial Intelligence andobot esponsibilities Innovating Beyondights J Science and Engineering Ethics 2015 2 317-326 18 M 2012 614 19 Jack Balkin The Path of obotics Law J California Law eview 2015 6 45-60 20 The European Parliament With ecommen-dations to the Commission on Civil Law ules on
6、obotics 2015/2103 INL EB/OL 2017-01-27 2017-10-01 http/www europarl europa eu/sides/getDoc do Lan-guage=ENaereference=A8-2017-0005type=EPOT 21 Samir Chopra Laurence F White A LegalTheory for Autonomous Artificial Agents M Michigan Michigan University ofMichigan Press 2011 22 Lawrence Solum Legal Per
7、sonhood for Artifi-cial Intelligences J North Carolina Law e-view 1992 70 1231-1287 23 M 2017 231 24“”EB/OL 2017-02-24 2016-10-04 ht-tp/wwwsohucom/a/127188006_345191 25 Gunther Teubner ights of Non-humans E-lectronic Agents and Animals as New Actors in Politics and Law J Journal of Law andSociety 20
8、06 4 497-521 26 8 8 2018 J 2017 5 128-136 27、M 2015 3-30 28 J 2016 3 157-166 29“”J 2016 7 22-23 The Legal Personality of obots Legal Prospects of the Subject Status of Artificial Intelligence CHEN Ji-dong School of Law Shanghai University Shanghai 200444 China Abstract obots and artificial intellige
9、nce in a wider sense do not have a subject status in the current law However the subjects of civil law show the trend of expansion and there are no technological obstacles in empowering robots with legal status The overseas discussion about robots subject qualification in the law di-verges into two
10、trends objectivism and subjectivism The objectivism includes the theory of product liability the theory of analogizing the application of animal subject and other different theories The subjectivism in-cludes the theory of agency the theory of electronic personality and other different demonstration
11、 methods However the objectivism cannot cope with the rapid development and the intellectualization of robots Mean-while the subjectivism fails to take into account the reality that the artificial intelligence is yet to develop into full-blown At present the discussion of legal personality of robots
12、 in China should be based on the theory ofthe explanation of positive law and conform to the principle of“artificial intelligence as the object”In addi-tion we can take artificial intelligence under specific circumstances as legal subjects by the legal technology of“fiction”so as to lay further legal foundation in the face of rapid development of artificial intelligence Key words robots the legal personality of artificial intelligence electronic personality fiction 9 8 3
