1、剑桥雅思小作文范文剑桥雅思小作文范文篇一：剑桥雅思 8 四套题写作答案目录剑桥雅思 8 作文范文 Test1Task1 . 2剑桥雅思 8 作文范文 Test1Task2 . 4剑桥雅思 8 作文范文 Test2Task1 . 8剑桥雅思 8 作文范文 Test2Task2 . 10剑桥雅思 8 作文范文 Test3Task1 . 14剑桥雅思 8 作文范文 Test3Task2 . 16剑桥雅思 8 作文范文 Test4Task1 . 20剑桥雅思 8 作文范文 Test4Task2 . 21剑桥雅思 8 作文范文 Test1Task1题目分析,包括回答中需要涉及的要点、对比以及考生可能对题
2、目产生的错误理解。要点1. 这个饼形图表现了导致土地退化的三个主要原因。2. 表格中列举的三个地区土地退化的原因各有不同考生可能产生的错误理解和问题1. 第二个表格中列举的数字是某种原因导致的退化的土地在所有退化土地中所占的比例,而不是在所有土地(包括退化的土地和建议的写作结构,对比此结构与考生有可能采用的不恰当结构。介绍部分应该把题目用自己的话重写一遍。最好用一段描述饼形图,另起一段描述图表。 可以直接引用图表中的数据(切记这些数据是退化土地面积的比例),或者指出相对的比例 (见参考范文) 。最后应该有一个简短的结论。参考范文：The pie chart and table show how
3、 land around the world was degraded during the 1990s the former on a worldwide scale and the latter in three different regions.Worldwide, over-grazing was the biggest cause of land degradation (35%), with deforestation causing 30% and over-cultivation causing slightly less (28%). Other factors cause
4、d 7% of land degradation.The table shows that, during the 1990s, 23% of the land in Europe was degraded, more than in Oceania (13%) and far more than in North America (5%). In Oceania, over-grazing was primarily responsible for land degradation, with deforestation accounting for far less and none ca
5、used through over-cultivation. In North America, over-cultivation was the main reason, with about a third of land degradation being caused by over-grazing and very little being caused by deforestation. In Europe, deforestation was responsible for about 40% of the land degradation, over-cultivation a
6、bout 30% and over-grazing about 20%.To summarise, land degradation was due to three main factors and these factors differed in proportion in different regions.(168 words)饼形图和图表反映了 20 世纪 90 年代全世界土地的退化情况前者是针对世界范围, 后者是针对三个不同的区域。世界范围内,过度畜牧是土地退化的最主要原因( 占 35%),滥砍滥伐占了 30%,过 度开垦相对影响较小(28%) 。其他导致土地退化的原因占了 7%
7、。图表反映出,20 世纪 90 年代,欧洲有 23% 的土地退化了,高于大洋洲(13%), 并且远超过北美 (5%)。在大洋洲,过度畜牧是土地退化的主要原因,其次是滥砍滥伐,相对 较少,没有过度开垦的行为。在北美,过度开垦是主要原因,有三分之一的土地退化受过 度畜牧的影响,极少部分是因为滥砍滥伐造成的。在欧洲,因滥砍滥伐导致的土地退化占 40%,过度开垦占 30%,过度畜牧占 20%。总体来看,土地退化是由以上三个主要方面造成的,这些方面在不同的区域影响各有不同。参考范文中的词汇及结构分析,以及考生可能犯的错误。1. 引言部分指出饼形图和图表中的信息有何种不同。2. 在正文第一段,作者使用“c
8、ause”和“causing”两个词,显示了作者根据语法要求可使用不同词性的同根词的能力。3. 正文第二段第一句简略阐述了图表信息。正文第二段,作者运用对比性词语(primarily, ?far less, main, very little),用以说明各种原因在土地退化上所起的不同影响。4. 在描述欧洲的土地退化状况时,作者换成更数学化的描述方法。剑桥雅思 8 作文范文 Test1Task2题目分析,包括写作中需要涉及的要点以及考生可能对题目产生的错误理解。1. 需要关注双方的观点。2. 由于答案不可能是仅靠父母或学校就能教育孩子们成为一名优秀的社会成员,因此,选择陈述双方的观点会更容易些。
9、3.“优秀的社会成员 ”并没有界定。但是,考生不必阐释出自己对其的定义。建议的回答结构,对比此结构与考生有可能采用的不恰当结构。这篇作文需要一个简短介绍和简要的结论。正文应有两到三个段落,每段阐述一个要点。考生可以选择三个及以上的段落,如果他们的文章超过 300 个单词的话。建议考生单独写一个段落来阐述与题目意见相反的观点,或者考生在正文各段中提及反方的观点。考生写文章时要尽量避免观点过于极端,最好不要建议仅由父母或仅由学校承担教育孩子成 为优秀的社会成员的重任。两篇观点不同的参考范文(250 字 300 字) 参考范文 1建议是学校Some people believe parents sh
10、ould teach their children to be good members of society, but I and others think school is the main place for this to be taught.The main reason why I think schools should primarily be responsible for teaching children to be good members of society is that children spend more time at school with teach
11、ers than with their parents. The children are also in a formal learning environment. This combination provides more opportunities for teachers to show children how to behave as good members of society. The teachers can also ensure that all the children have the same chance to learn the same things a
12、bout being good members of society.If parents are made more responsible for teaching their children to be good members of society, then many parents might find they do not have the time for this. Parents have many responsibilities such as work and taking care of the home. Of course, many parents wil
13、l naturally prefer to do other things with their children, such as having fun and visiting places of interest. In addition, some parents might not be as experienced as teachers at teaching children, so the children might not learn as well as at school.There will always be plenty of parents who have
14、the time, willingness and ability to teach their children to be good members of society. However, many more will find it difficult and need extra help. Some will ask other parents or consult books or websites. I do not think there is anything wrong with this, but we should not assume that all parent
15、s will do it.In summary, I think parents will often teach their children to be good members of society, but this should mainly be done at schools.(294 words)一些人认为父母应该教育孩子成为优秀的社会成员,但我和另外一些人认为,学校应 该是承担这种教育的地方。我认为学校应该首要承担教育孩子成为栋梁之才的主要原因是,孩子们在学校和老师 待的时间比与他们和父母待的时间长。此外,孩子们是在正式的学习环境下成长的。这两 点证明老师有更多的机会教给孩子
16、们如何成为栋梁之才。同时,老师也能确保所有的孩子 有均等的学习机会,去学习成为优秀的社会成员的相同的知识。如果让父母来承担教育孩子成为优秀的社会成员的主要责任,那么就会有很多父母发 现自己并没有时间来做这件事。父母承担着诸如工作和照顾家庭的责任。当然了,很多父 母自然更愿意为孩子做些其他的事情,比如陪孩子出去玩、游览名胜古迹等。除此之外, 一些父母可能不像老师那么经验丰富,所以孩子可能没有在学校学习得效果好。常常是很多父母有时间、意愿和能力教育他们的孩子成为优秀的社会成员。但是,还 有很多父母会觉得做起来有困难,需要他人的帮助。有些父母会咨询其他父母,或求助于 书籍、网站。我不觉得这样做有什么
17、问题,但是我们不能想当然的认为所有的父母都做得到。总的来说,我觉得父母会常常教育孩子们成为优秀的社会成员,但这种教育主要还是 要学校来做。参考范文 2建议是父母I think that the main responsibility for teaching children to be good members of society lies with parents rather than schools and shall outline my reasons in this essay.I think that most parents know their children well
18、 enough to be able to teach them to be good members of society. At school, children are often in large classes and therefore do not receive so much individual attention. When teaching children to be good members of society, I think that this individual attention is important, because some will have
19、learnt about membership of society and others not. The parents will generally know this and be able to fill any missing gaps in their childs knowledge.Secondly, parents and their children will probably spend more time together in a variety of social situations, whereas teachers and their students sp
20、end most of their time together in the classroom. The variety of social situations gives the parents more teaching opportunities, for example while shopping, at public events and at family gatherings. Of course, these opportunities give children the chance to learn to be good members of society from
21、 other adults, not only from their parents.Thirdly, I believe that schools and teachers should focus on academic subjects. There is often little enough time for these at schools, so making parents responsible for non- academic things, such as teaching children to become good members of society is a
22、good idea. However, there will be opportunities for teachers to point out in class how children can be good members of society, for example when teaching children about the environment.To conclude, I think there are clear advantages in having both parents and schools teach children how to be good members of society, but parents should take most of the responsibility.剑桥雅思小作文范文篇二：! 剑桥雅思大作文(A 类)题目+范文剑桥雅思作文题目- 大作文目录IELTS 8 . 2Test 1 . 2Test 2 . 2Test 3 . 2Test 4 . 2IELTS 7 . 2Test 1 . 2Test 2 P165 . 3Test 3 P167 . 4Test 4 . 5IELTS 6 . 5Test 1 . 5Test 2 .
