1、。Passage One Questions 56 to 60 are based on the following passage.Texting has long been bemoaned (哀叹）as the downfall of the written word,”penmanship for illiter,”as one critic called it. To which the proper response is LOL.Texting properly isnt writing at all. Its a “spoken” language that is gettin
2、g richer and more complex by the year.First,some historical perspective. Writing was only invented 5,500 years ago. whereas Ianguage probably traces back at least 80.000 years. Thus talking came first; writing is just a craft that came along later. As such, the first writing was based on the way peo
3、ple talk，with short sentences.However, while talking is largely subconscious and rapid, writing is deliberate and slow, Over time,writers took advantage of this and started cratting long-winded sentences such as this one:The whole engagement lasted above 12 hours, till the gradual retreat of the Per
4、 trsians was changed into a disorderly flight, of which the shameful example was given by the principal leaders and”No one talks like that casually or should. But it is natural to desire to do so for special occasions. In the old days, we didnt much write like talking because there was no mechanism
5、to reproduce the speed of conversation. But texting and instant messaging do and a revolution has begun. It involves the crude mechanics of writing, but in its economy, spontaneity and even vulgaritv. texting is actually a new kind of talking, with its own kind of grammar and conventions.Take LOL. I
6、t doesnt actually mean “laughing out loud” in a literal sense anymore. LOL has evolved into something much subtler and sophisticated and is used even when nothing is remotely amusing. Jocelyn texts “Where have you been?” and Annabelle texts back ，LOL at the library studying for two hours.” LOL signa
7、ls basic empath)（同感)between tcxters. easing tension and creating a sense of equality. Instead of having a literal meaning, it docs something - conveying an attitude just like the -cd ending conveys past tense rather than “meaning.，anything. LOL. of all things, is grammar.。Of course no one thinks abo
8、ut that consciously. But then most of communication operates without being noticed. Over time, the meaning of a word or an expression drifts meat used to mean any kind of food, silly used to mean, believe it or not，blessed.Civilization, then，is fine 一 people banging away on their smartphones are flu
9、ently using a code separate from the one they use in actual writing, and there is no evidence that texting is ruining composition skills. Worldwide people speak differently from the w ay they write, and texting -quick, casual and only intended to be read once is actually a way of talking with your f
10、ingers.56. What do critics say about texting?A) It is mainly confined to youngstersB) It competes with traditional writing.C) It will ruin the wnttcn language.D) It is often hard to understand.57. In what way does the author say writing is different from talking?A) It is crafted with specific skills
11、. C) It does not have as long a history.B) It expresses ideas more accuratcly.D) It is not as easy to comprehend.58. Why is LOL much used in tcxting?A) It brings textcrs closer to each other.B) It shows the tcxtcrs sophistication.C) It is a trendy way to communicateD) It adds to the humor of the tex
12、t59. Examples like meat and silly are cited to showA) the difTerencc between writing and talkingB) how difTercntly words are used in tcxtingC) why people use the words the way they doD) the gradual change of word meaning60.what does the author think of texting?A)It facilitates exchange of ideas amon
13、g people.B)It is a new form of verbal communication.。C)It deteriorates pelples composition skills.D)It hastens the decline of the written word.Passage Two Questions 61to 65are based on the following passage.its possible to admire oprah winfrey and still wish Harvard hadnt awarded her an honorary doc
14、tor of law degree and the commencement(毕业典礼)speaker spot at yesterdays graduation.Theres no question Oprahs achievements place her in the temple of American success stories. Talent,charm,and an exceptional work ethic have rarely hurled anyone of worlds most successful entertainment icons and the fir
15、st African-American female billionaire.Honorary degrees are often conferred on non-academic leaders in the arts,business,and politics.Harvards list in recent years has included Kofi fi Annan,Bill Gates,Meryl Streep,and David Souter.But Oprahs list in recent years has included Kofi Annan,Bill Gates,M
16、ery1 Streep,and david souter.But Oprahs particular brand of celebrity is not a good fit for the values of a university whose motto（座右铭）,Veritas,means truth.Oprahs passionate advocacy extends,unfortunately,to a hearty embrace of fake science.Most notoriously,Oprahs validation of jenny McCarthys claim
17、 that vaccines cause autism(自闭症)has no doubt contributed to much harm through the foolish avoidance of vaccines.Famous people arc entitled to a few failings, like the rest of us. and the choice of commencement speakers often reflects a balance of insututional pnonties and aspirations. Judging from o
18、ur conversations with many students. Oprah was a widely popular choice.But this vote of confidence in Oprah sends a troubling message at precisely the time when American univereities need to do more to advance the cause of reason. As former Dean of Harvard College. Harry Lewis, noted in a blog post
19、about his objections. “It seems vcrv odd for Harvard to honor such a high profile popularizer of the irrational at a time when political and religious nonsense so jeopardize the rule of reason in this allegedly enlightened democracy and around the world.”As Americas oldest and most visible universit
20、y. Harvard has a spccial opportunity to convey its respcct for science not only 。through its research and teaching programs but also in its public affirmation of evidence-based inquiry.Unfortunately，many American universities seem awfully busy protecting their brand name and not nearly busy enough p
21、rotecting the pursuit of knowledge. A recent article in The Harvard Crimson noted the shocking growth of Harvards public relations arm in the last five years and it questioned whether a focus on risk management and avoiding controversywas really the best outward-looking face of this great institutio
22、n.As American research universities begin to resemble profit centers and entertainment complexes, its easy to lose sight of their primary mission; to produce and spread knowledge.This mission depends on traditions of rational discourse and vigorous defense of the scientific method.Oprah Winfreys hon
23、oray doctorate was a step in the wrong direction.61.what do we learn about Oprah Winfrey from the passage?A)She was a distinguished graduate of H arvard School of LaW.B)She worked her way to success in the entertainment industry.C)She used to abuse her children when she was a young mother.D)She achi
24、eved her fame through persistent advocacy of fake science.62.Why does the author deem it inappropriate for Harvard to confer an honorary degree on Oprah winfrey?A) She did not specialize in the study of law.B)She was known as a supporter of fake science.C)She was an icon of the entertainment industr
25、yD)She had not distinguished herself academically.63.How did Harry Lewis react to Harvards decision in his blong post ?A)He was strongly against it.B)He considered it unpopular.C)He thought it would help enhance Harvards reputation.D)He thought it represented the will of the Harvard community.64.Wha
26、t is the authors regret about many American universities?A)They show inadequate respect for evidence-based inquiryB)They fall short of expectations in teaching and research。C)They attach too much importance to public relationsD)They are tolerant of political and religious nonsense65.What does the author think a prestigious university like H arvard should focus on?A)Cultivation of student creativityB)Liberation of the human mindC)Liberation of the human mindD)Pursuit of knowledge and truth
