1、 SZ 2006143 475480 Advances in Psychological Science 475 # ?Zf Q =Sv qK 1 Tajfel Turner 4 8S di 81“KY b 3 8W d 8 8 8$b9 4 B b x r1T 1 D H 9B b 1oM Bl 1s 1 us b s | B849:C91 8 B1 57 XB 5KY Bb Tajfel 20 W 70 M4i 8?Z b Turner4 1B B B b 8 dT 4 M1 5?Z 8 S v D1b|V/+Z b Bl 3 d 8WBlethnoentrismbBl = 8 zin-g
2、roup favoritism 8 jout-group derogationb 8 = 8WAC ABl+2bo 8 RB+pBQ 1 1906 M : b KBl dKY C L l realistic conflict theoryb C L l Tajfel - 8W * Sherif 1961 M81 7 L Lb Sherif| 1M M8r1 7soY po p F 7 S V YlF = l 20050925 YTQ E-mail FV Y o 1 F l 9b“4K N H FXMM1-lFVC _ 7 6BFVC j b Sherif L U 8W Z41“ 8WYbN
3、Sherif 4 C L l realistic conflict theory 8W Q B 8 8W Z4mb T 8 “SBB 8 8 mN71- “SCyN 8W _ j Mib 6BZ T 8 “S B 8B “S m * 4NWy azaT1“b C Ll d 8W Tajfel C L l S z b 8W nKlHqTajfel19701971 Ke 8 LS TMinimail-Group paradigm7/ Bo 8 Wp P L V 4 8TZ T3,4b 5 h$ kBf 5 9TiN |$ ks FFFb“1 p$ ks TbTA Ut$ k FM M7 OV L=
4、 s 1- FY b Tajfel L/+ 1 8W; 2 8 = 3 8W V 5b-476- SZ 2006 M TA U$ kB $s Hs1- 8_ Nb s 4 $1- 7 3B “ =8 #_ NC = 8_ 7 85s i_ NC 8 j5b Ke 8 LTA U 8 &zi M 3 8KHqb P sBeail Y 9 3 8 |_ $b Tajfel Ke 8S T$ B4 b 8 8 8$b 4 8YVs 1- 8 3 i 3 = 8 z 8 nb8YV LC social identity 41M1M = 8M1 8 1 b sH8 41Mb8Vs 1- 8 1- 81
5、8zi p 1M8v8Ws 8W n 8W lb lTurner Tajfel1986 us 8 8 TY 8 8+1 +1v 7 T B Y 81 6b Tajfel1978| l o8 M + 8 H9 MT 8 fNilb p7 K 8 &zb 9 | b7 YV = 8M1 81 b T i 8 7 8XE LC usb P us Turner Tajfel FM Y 8W us 1 A4 = 8 2 f N 8W1 3 8A V s1 b Tajfel p 8W l j 8i M Y“ $a b V s social-categorization a1 social comparis
6、on us5positive distinctivenessy 8b s Tajfel 1963 MB LV 1 p$ kVMS A LS B L H _ qv A BWsb C oFrp accentuation effectbFr“VCO $ b Secord 1959 MB“ $ kCB“ v BF BB 1 p NM bT$ k|m s Fi t_ qvBF =M FWsbFr 9 s L2b Turner1985B4 1B self-categorization theory Tajfel 1| Ys Y yN| s H1 us = 8 8b s H|19 , B Y| = 8+|1
7、 B1Vb8YVs | s Z 8b 1 1 Ps Vil A“P us5 T7 us 81M1b 8W1 YV us5 P8 p1 N1 b 8W1 H _+ qv 8Ws7 8 = Nb“ 3 8 N _1- 8V a f 8b us B1L ! = = 1 B 14 1 # ?Z -477- 1 ?b 1M 81“ 8 1M17l Z +byN 881 P8 81 M1 VC1 us5b 8Vs 1- 8 1 8zi OV p 1M8 8Ws“ 8W na 8W lib 1ML ! YV us N 7 us 81M1b U1M1? 8 8 9 1M1b Abrams Hogg(1988)
8、B 1ML ! w 9 w 1 8W us V4 V741MbT 88| = 8 8 us1Mbw 2 |1M11M1M s? 8W jb 7w 2 i s w 1w 2?C MQT Houston 2003?C1M 8 VC 8W j10b =s 8W1“ +Y 8 81 bC L 3 YV 81“ 4 social mobilityasocial competitiona7/social creativityb 4G 1- 8 81“ $b 81“ M 8H V 1ipermeabilitya 8 legitimacytsstabilityb7 81“ f /8i 8“ 8“social
9、mobility belief structureM8“ (social change belief structure)b 8“ M 8H YiB V 8W H 3 8“b 8 T 8“ m |F 6B 8V7 i I | b $8 bB7 8 4B8“y i kmM 8WC7 O V 8 E “8 Fb 898 BK 1- SM ebM8“7 8WH %VYi B ?VB 8 8 H 3M8“b H 8F 1- 8 1 p 8hZ N .“8 wJ 8 bZ sY7/b7/ 8W1“C$ AT a 8 b 4 1 a C1 N#M1 8M 81 b - ZE 8B V s H Nb T 8
10、1“C$ AT * 8 b H 8 V h us 8 F Ua a . b7 89 + Y m 8 b yNB K V ? 8W lb Z“8 B1 5 “8b+Y 8W l b.d M o| Fpa yM“8 AT 8o| bV 8W1 3“8 “8 MM1b7 B1 D U M -478- SZ 2006 M 3 s VY B1M b Smith 1994?C 8“8 8VC A H 11bKelly Breinlinger V o l?C o oE F“8SBt Y f p12bLiss 20049?C o l o l T13bKelly 1996# Simon1998?CF a 8a
11、88 t 8 14bHirose2005?CQ) 8“8 =8 zM115b9 8 8 H 3 = 8 z8 n .F“82,16b 6 F?C F9M1b LCF “SaF Di# VCF M1b Greene2004 n?C V n17b B5 B jBliB5 WbBW 81-B 8 B 8VC zbMQ 1-B B 8 s MBb 4bNegy 2003 486 v 318A U B Bl AM1b Sidanius 2004 SF Dv “snUCLAB _ 3 86?CB 8 &z4 B V79F BW n#B 8W $19bJohnson 2005 255 v Y n9?C a
12、V 1iaE# = 8 $ V 8 nY20b NZ NTajfel Turner U = = b 4 s E W1 o p QX$ W si? v M1b nQ = = usi 8 8Q us 1 $ b 6 =1 =1 81M“81M ust Q 3 Yb op 81“/ 81“ 38 8 bV7 Y U Lb S V8 op “1 uY x r1TBb S S T K S T “ x T?Z 90 M S 7 S 9 S B21b Vn S 1Yb X x W K D 22b Tajfel Ke 8S T # 8 L Wb Tajfel N7B 8 L i L5b A Tajfel 8
13、BoBep = Cb 6 Q &?Z1ML !av81M 4Z B b Z 10 M x S v_ 9C t - S T9 x S TB22b“ ?Z9_ FVZ bK 8 V1 M_ h s 8il b6?C VCZ T9 8sY ts 8+ 8 s _VC nib 14 1 # ?Z -479- +5B Q &B?Z 1 4 / # = Vs1b * 51 8 n l d1 hZ 7 h“ 8 n l|?Z T ?CYV 8(s Vh“ 8 nl23Z ?Z1ilb “ -S = 1“P Yau 1998,2003,20041P M &z a uSE 21b7Z2005s24 = 4 7
14、bSYVr C 9 |wS Y?Zb+Y 8 n 8 Y T jbS “ -) 85 VYV 4b 6S BSE B a B Y B n1“ |4B b7S/ I 8 8 Yaa B YT9| rB1 5b ID 1 Brown R. Social Identity Theory:past achievements,current problems and future challenges. Eurpean Journal Social Psychology, 2000, 30: 745778 2 M X . iiBHo . Z =Sv 2000. 611621 3 Tajfel H. Ex
15、periments in Ingroup Discrimination. Scientific American, 1970, 223 (5) 4 Tajfel H, Billig M G,Bundy R P. Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. Eur. J. soc. Psychol, 1971, 1: 149178 5 Otten S, Mummendey A. To our benefit or at your expense? justice considerations in intergroup allocations of positive and negative resources. Social Justice Research, 1999, 12(1): 1938 6 Tafel H, Turn
