1、十二怒汉观后感英文在十二怒汉里，由 12 普通民众组成的陪审团中，仅有一个 8 号的建筑师，凭借陪审团 12 位成员必须达成一致方可定罪原则，第一次投票便投了无罪一票，致使大部分陪审员只想走完程序给被告定罪的想法落空。下面是英文的十二怒汉观后感，欢迎阅读。十二怒汉观后感英文 Back to the room, slumped in a chair, all of a sudden no fighting spirit. Turn over the film, to avoid the destruction of negative emotions. This is a classic old
2、 piece called “Twelve Angry Chinese“. The story is a jury of twelve members, in a small conference room to discuss whether a juvenile murderer is guilty, the process of ups and downs, the outcome of great. It is a classic, in my view is that: shooting the film in the more distant, black and white, b
3、ut I very smoothly finished it; and after reading without a tired feeling, but a kind of scattered emotions, it is difficult to name. Want to know my only two live watch 3D blockbuster (Pirates of the Caribbean and Pacific rim of the Pacific Ocean), are watching the sleep of the 4. As a blind dull v
4、iewing fans, meet the “Twelve Angry Han“ such a film, the top of your lungs are also top ah. The film explores the justice of the law and the freedom of the individual. The whole discussion is done in one scene. The reason in a narrow monotonous stuffy room shooting, but also let the audience watchi
5、ng the breath, the key is in one word: MAYBE. MAYBE, that is, that is, a hypothesis. If Xu Xian by Lady White Umbrella, there is no “White Snake“ hypothesis; these twelve individuals began to agree with all the youth guilty, there is no next twelve angry men. The twelve person is not a judge or a la
6、wyer, they did not need to prove that young guilty, they think, so the boy could sit chair; they think that no, they just need to find out the possibility of the juvenile is not a murderer. So the focus of controversy, are around a possibility. One may be denied, and the next may be raised. If we ca
7、n tolerate the possibility that there is no such a possibility, then our personality, and perhaps will be more sound. You want to, the children came home from school late, parents immediately decided to go, so he hit the plane delayed whiplash; passengers, decided that some officials with the right
8、gasser, life to wait for the plane. There is no such a possibility: children encounter love girls, to go; do not fly the aircraft, because the captain constipation but not said. In the film, an angry mouth said: this boy is a slum grew up, where the child was born barbaric, fighting and killing no h
9、uman nature, the boy must be guilty. While he was speaking, all the members of the jury have got up and left, turned back, except one, who also cant endure the angry man said: please sit down and shut up. In other words, to judge a person, who can not be based on personal bias. Once stubborn prejudi
10、ce, it will kill all the precious possibilities, it will be fair and far away, to despise. Americans are proud of their laws because they tolerate all kinds of possibilities and give each person the freedom to make every choice possible. MAYBE, a chance, a chance. Many lovers break up, because they
11、do not believe it is possible, do not give each other the opportunity. In some countries, good people are not happy cause bad, do not give the opportunity, but because of the justice of law with the lack of personality, more and more far away from the people, leaving only a false balance, at this ti
12、me for the opportunity, but also desperate. At the end of the film, two angry men in the court gate shookhis hand, each name. And then return to the house, as if the previous argument is just a lazy rain in the evening. However, I do not know how many viewers in their back to see, is the dignity of
13、personality independence and justice hope. 十二怒汉观后感英文 But think about it, or only gave three stars. Why? Because the movie is not pure. It is the theme of too much, the amount of information you want to convey is too large, although not so difficult to understand and accept, but the actual shot out o
14、f the situation is much more confusing: the jury system questioned the original Lumet preserved, influence to the Russian Chechen War mentality is he stressed, then through to Russias dissatisfaction with the status quo of the beginning (“streets are Mercedes BMW Audi, only three minutes walk to the
15、 theatre of the road eight“), the narrative part involved everyone when mixed with too much of everyones personal feelings, almost everyone said a case may not have with their the relationship between the piece, and then to the case itself (because of a surge in interest related to ethnic issues ah)
16、 increased the number of suspense drama elements, and finally to a strange man fancy Wang Yi think that this version than the conception of Lumet high, oh, maybe, but was not everything, although Kharkov has never let his film meters out of control, but still seem messy, and the strength is a scatte
17、red, feeling no matter which themes are focused on not just skimming over the surface like this in the past. No matter - I hate conception conception is not in the way of literature to discuss the film, the film quality, whether it is the rhythm, focus, or narrative control, this is a lot less than
18、the old version. Then talk about technology. Whether new or old version, is a technology very good film, but the difference is that the old version of the technology, with the integration of narrative is very good, whether it is the opening track length mirror beautiful, or to enter the space after
19、the precise positioning, had a sudden feeling, and the new version, most of the time, let the people think it is a virtuoso technique - try a decorative. For example, 4 ed in dog holding hands through the lens, in a sense, can reduce at least once, always repeat, even the flashing lights of suspense
20、, to finally will make people feel flat and uninteresting. Watch this movie shows a sense, not the seafood cooked together, called sea food and poultry, or a hodgepodge. By the way of Mikhalkov, the Slavophilism heavy director, is now famous Russian director in one of the largest, but I am not very
21、love, because that kind of Slavic tastes! Sometimes, in order to render this complex, he is willing to destroy the whole structure of the film (Siberia barber), so that the mood itself has become an independent part of the film. When it comes to artistic conception, with the same Slavic complex than
22、 Sokolov, far worse. 十二怒汉观后感英文 I dont know when to start, when upset or depressed, I used to find old movies, especially in black and white, from which get quiet and elegant is important to me. When the movie is the movie, every word, every shot, a seamless heavenly robe. If not a summer night, in f
23、ront of the 12 inch TV “murder in the Orient Express“, I am afraid I will not engage in the occupation, so Sidney Lumet on my film concept that enlightenment can be formed. Not only is my occupation, Lumet outlook on life enlightenment, than the so-called supernatural forces of evil, I fear more com
24、plex. So far, I do not dare to read the murder of the Orient Express, the original, even if I have read most of Agathas works, for fear that the text will destroy my heart on the film version of the feelings. “Twelve Angry Men“ is a kind of courage to cash, Henry Fonda against eleven companions of c
25、ourage, personal subjective experience and attitude against the truth of courage, fairness and justice against self courage, American judicial system and social harmony of confrontation, and of course Lv Mei will have the courage. If I in twelve, I will think what what language, I am afraid that I a
26、m going with Ning Wang Zong not paranoid, or just because the bad boy will affect the society and others, so he will be charged to preach. This is not only my own narrow, I believe this is the so-called “good man“ narrow. He is good at a single space, refining and performance in depth at mining and
27、play on the event. “Twelve Angry Men“, “summer afternoon“, “Murder on the Orient Express“ is a single main space, single and multi scene, closed interior, rich images may have been the maximum limit, but these films are undoubtedly good. Hitchcock was regarded as a master, he is often neglected, com
28、parison of production, the style is fixed, is probably Lumets limitations, but I still Lumet grievance. Who bought a home on film creation works in the United States, it is a pity that English, lazy I still will put on the shelf. I love those who do not show off the lens of the director, even if I t
29、each audio-visual, but do not think that audio-visual should be placed above the film, the film is still moving me those characters and stories. So I love Billy Wilde, I love Sidney lumet. Most of the enclosed space is the scene of studio Lumets studio, but he always prefers to use even short focus
30、wide-angle lens, especially the “Orient Express“, if not considering the light, three foot position and space depth background that really makes people think a real. So is the “Twelve Angry Men“, using live scene very well, but he is not very restrained, the excessive use of “impossible shots“, get
31、consensus only at the end of twelve jurors picked up one by one, hung in the closet coat slowly out of the lens with dressing cabinet a few suits the prospect of jury they are leaving, finally leaving Henry Fonda picked up is still lying in the last like a stubborn choked the suit on the table, put
32、him on, this is the understanding and support between men. He was restrained, even if the opening second is through the lens space and the atmosphere design of long lens typical account court, until out of the case is still the core of the film court. But as the opening is very suitable for the era,
33、 which has no feelings of infatuation to mirror director long, compared with Ocean Wellss “touch of evil“, this scene actually has been quite restrained. He was restrained, he did not because the single space added in the trial court, witnesses the flashback or reproduce the scene. For most of the d
34、irectors, such a structure is always inevitable, even though I, although we all understand the interest and charm of a single space, but no confidence or ability to truly achieve such a perfect. He was restrained, he did not take Henry Fonda design into absolute hero, he is just a lot of sanity, the
35、 testimony of witnesses of the confusion is gradually put forward by other jurors, everyone to put forward their own personal experience and observation questions, such as poor background, people questioned the holding spring knife method, the old man questioned the witness of vision. Throughout the
36、 discussion, a juror number is outside the role of internal organizer, Fonda organizer, only this. He was restrained, even his warmth. At the end of the jurors out of court, the rain has stopped, summer evening and the sky, as the first man to supporters Fonda, two people for each name, then separat
37、ed from. He was restrained, he did not go to revisit the superfluous case is non truth, that has nothing to do with the story of the core, the core of the story is just a boy of guilty or not guilty. A building is successful, the development of drama is successful, but the control in restraint extre
38、mely in the home. Study and drama director, “Twelve Angry Men“ is absolutely worth repeatedly fine works. Once again, he to me movie ideas and life beliefs are deeply influenced, but the master. I love this summer, you can see a good movie, you can write, you can look at their own rational and restrained.
